You're implying that moderation isn't capable of being flawed (not intentionally but it's implied). Also avoided addressing my assertion. I'm not questioning the fact that it was deleted, I'm questioning the time that elapsed inbetween creation of post and deletion. That would allude to it being deleted for reasons that arose after initial rule check. I could be wrong of course lol. If you're trying to analyze whether or not there are negative underlying intentions from moderation then these details can be important.
view the rest of the comments →
2impendingdoom ago
I think that they delete a thread if it starts to get down voats, you can't voat on a deleted post.
iamthepizzanow ago
They delete threads that do not abide by the rules.
druhill007 ago
If that's the rationale then why would it have been allowed to stay up for so long and gain so much traction?
iamthepizzanow ago
I would assume if it stays up that it is following the rules.
druhill007 ago
You're implying that moderation isn't capable of being flawed (not intentionally but it's implied). Also avoided addressing my assertion. I'm not questioning the fact that it was deleted, I'm questioning the time that elapsed inbetween creation of post and deletion. That would allude to it being deleted for reasons that arose after initial rule check. I could be wrong of course lol. If you're trying to analyze whether or not there are negative underlying intentions from moderation then these details can be important.
druhill007 ago
Ah just saw edit. Guess user was deleted, not thread? Either way maintaining mod vigilance is important, although shouldn't be a top 5 focus