David Seaman recently predicted in one of his vlogs that there is going to be full on msm onslaught of "alien talk" this year, in an attempt to distract from all things pizzagate (and introduce the concept of Antarctica/surroundings, as a new possible 'elite escape continent' into public consciousness.)
***My FIRST posting - DM main science section article of Tech Billionaires fleeing to NZ - was removed from PizzaGate subverse.
***My SECOND posting - DM HEADLINE of ALIEN INVASION - was also removed.
***My THIRD posting - DM HEADLINE of PYRAMID/ALIEN TECHNOLOGY THEORY- Removed.
***My FOURTH posting - DM HEADLINE of THE DISCOVERY OF A NEW CONTINENT NEXT TO NEW ZEALAND (ZEALANDIA) - removed too.
I now present Exhibit E - NASA IS HIDING ALIENS.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4235930/UFOlogists-claim-alien-spaceships-flew-past-ISS.html
Daily Mail is read by 200 million people, globally, every day.
ps- are we getting distracted from Pizzagate yet....?
view the rest of the comments →
rodental ago
Fuck off with David Seaman. He torched his own credibility, and referencing him just makes us look like idiots.
tehthu ago
what has he done to lose credibility? I've watched every video since the start of PG and have only seen his audience rise.
wtf are you talking about ?
rodental ago
Not sure if serious? Six days ago he said to "expect high level arrests by tonight / tomorrow" according to his "inside source", and that he would out said source if it didn't pan out. When it didn't pan out he had a temper tantrum and refused to identify his "source". And if you've watched his videos for that long then you've watched him descend into what looks to me like a psychotic break.
tehthu ago
So his source, who he considered solid based on previous information, is wrong on the timing and Seaman is evermore discredited? That's fucking ridiculous.
Particularly considering the amount of arrests globally and the pace of arrrsts increasing.
The only people discredited in my eyes is the fakestream media and the toolbags from David Brock's orgs being paid to derail and demoralize their political opponents on Internet forums.
rodental ago
He said he would reveal his source if it didn't pan out, then he didn't. That tells me he's probably either crazy, or was just bullshitting about having a source in the first place.
Don't write checks you can't cover and you won't look like an idiot.
tehthu ago
Burning his source is his prerogative. I wouldn't threaten to burn a source, but I don't have a YouTube channel with 150k subs.
You see anyone else with a journalist pedigree putting their neck on the line for this investigation? I don't
rodental ago
Well, a few people, yeah.
tehthu ago
names? aside from Ben Swann?
rodental ago
Ben Swann, George Webb, Victus Whateveras, Alex Jones, probably a dozen more whose names you can find on this sub.
tehthu ago
Ok Ben Swann was effectively Discredited and disappeared within days of doing a piece on the topic
George Webb isn't a ""journalist"", or at least doesn't have a background in journalism so has "no credibility" in the eyes of the general population.
Alex Jones has been turned into a cartoon character by the Establishment media and effectively discredited.
Seaman wrote for the huffington post and his name carries weight. Ben Swann is the closest to him and look how that worked out.
Any other names?
Oh honorable mention to Rosannne Barr, but again, not a journalist and already in the process of being "discredited".
rodental ago
Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you actually considered Seaman a journalist. I don't believe he's one bit more of a journalist than the others. Less than most because he torched his own credibilty and appears to be having a psychotic break.
tehthu ago
Still waiting for you to explain how he "torched his credibility". Was it when he was fired from HuffPo for reporting that Hillary's health was completely fucked?... a few weeks before she had a seizure on the side of the road during the 9/11 memorial?
Or did he just torch his credibility for reporting that the code words used in Podesta's wikileaks emails?
Or did he torch his credibility because you're a toolbag shill?
My guess is the latter.
rodental ago
He torched his credibility when he said "major arrests tomorrow", and "i will expose my source if it doesn't happen". Then when it didnt happen he refused to expose his source.
tehthu ago
if you think that torches someones credibility, you would make for a very shitty intel analyst.