You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

je-sui-pepe ago

i would say this, what if the beasts (the kids) who are young but 17 is how old these kids are... have already been trained to go after the politicians who might have "proclivities" to younger boys or girls and they set them up to be compromised. Foley is not innocent of wrong doing, dont get me wrong, but the game in Washington is not innocent, nor are some of the Pages if they have grown up around the political scene and MK Ultra or whatever nutzoid parents they are raised by who are in these DC covens. Maybe Drudge is on to that.

organic1 ago

Could be, but I also found this:

"Boehner also suggested email were withheld for Boehner also suggested that emails were withheld for political purposes. "Campaign opponents might have made sure the e-mails surfaced close to midterm elections. "If this evidence was withheld for political purposes, one can only speculate as to how many additional children may have been endangered before this information was finally revealed." (via Petelit)

Josh Marshall wants to know if NRCC chief authorized a deal to try to stop the publication of Foley emails." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-elliott/foley-watch-special-after_b_30873.html

The fact that the word "children" is used means that there was much more than just older teens involved I would think.