CNN briefly reported on this before it was swept under the rug. This link has been shared here before but got little attention https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o6W8H5Z0XAc
The answer is decidedly NO. Can't you just read the very article you post? 5,200 names subscribing to CP. Only 3,500 were crosschecked. Only 264 (not 5,200) were specifically Pentagon-related. Only 20 percent of these 264 people were completely investigated and fewer still were prosecuted.
We pulled the court documents for the only arrest that was made public out of Project Flicker (the investigation you are referencing).
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1650535
iReport is CNN's anything-goes site where anybody can publish in CNN's name. The source for the number is the Wordpress blog Seeker 401. Its source is a set of stories in the Boston Globe in 2011 reporting on an investigation in 2006-2007.
This is sort of far fetched, but maybe not - maybe this is a way that Pentagon employees are kept in check. How do you maintain secrecy among 5000 people? You set up a child porn subscription for each of them, let them know, then tell them a story will run with their name and this information if they ever reveal a state secret. B/c what's worse than jail? Being known in society as a pedo. I just can't see that many people being into child porn, but who knows.
Are these individual people, or fake people? One person could be dumping money into 5200 separate accounts, to fund the subscriptions. I think this is more real than 5,200 real people subbing to kiddy porn. Just my .02.
Why would that need to occur? Theres no reason someone would need to do that. They would also require the cooperation of these other people anyways to orchestrate that anyways.
Why would they if they're government employees? Or if they're shell accounts. Hiding your money and using 5,200 different accounts to subscribe to something, its a lot easier to hide money, stay hidden, than to use just one account.
Well having the accounts/credentials of 5200 pentagon employees, all being compromised would be a massive scandal also. From how the report read, that wasn't the case.
Only one downvote? Now two!
People, you HAVE TO READ, before you upvote such BS-claims.
Despite the operation possibly tying as many as 5,000 individuals to child pornography sites and at least 264 of those people being linked directly to the DoD, 1,700 alleged child porn customers still went unchecked, and at least nine cases were closed because the investigators lacked “current, relevant evidence”
'When the Pentagon child pornography story surfaced in 2010, it was naturally one of those media reports that created a whirlwind of interest and astonishment. '
'Child pornography being linked to the American government has all the hallmarks of being one of the major scandals of the decade. '
'The project began in 2007 and identified more than 5,200 individuals who had subscribed to child pornography websites. '
'Why did Project Flicker end only eight months after it had started, without there being any charges or convictions, despite the fact that buying child pornography is illegal?'
'Yet almost as quickly as the scandal emerged, it disappeared, leaving the nation dumbfounded and none the wiser of its outcome. '
I believe 3 people were actually prosecuted for child porn because of this investigation. From what I read, the investigation was closed down because once the president and his advisors found out how prevalent and high ranking the child porn went, his advisors told him that prosecuting all 5200 employees it would topple the government. So he dropped it.
Good to hear but how are 5200 people at the Pentagon being overlooked? It's not like it was 20-30 instances, it's massive. It appears systemic. Good god!
This I believe is classic operation brownstone shit. "Welcome to the pentagon, here's your PC, with a secret stash of kiddie porn in case you ever step outta line"
They discovered it, started investigating, and maybe came to that conclusion when finding the 'subscriptions' were all or mostly dormant/unused
This is the point we need to pay more attention to, same with PGate in general. It's way more likely it's all about having blackmail on people for the rest of their lives. Some of these people may be entirely sick and enjoy what they're doing, but the main point is all about power and control, including forcing others to do things extremely heinous as evidence. This might be the entire reason you see some of the more depraved "jokes," because the ones in power are joking about the rituals they've made others perform on camera.
I know . it's become clear that the government has been controlled and corrupted by pedophiles for decades, just hope trump and the good guys come through , all we can do it keep trying to expose, keep up the good work
I do wonder if this is some form of control though. Dropping CP on someone's computer is a great way to shut them up if they were privy to some massive fuck up in some other area. And it's not like Hillary, Obama and their deep state pedo cronies didn't have a healthy supply of that shit to drop.
As PepperoniBoni says though, what sort of representative ratio is this? Is it weirdly over-represented? Is it focused in one or two particular departments? Or is there a "natural spread" of fuckbags, same as you'd see anywhere else?
Oldno7 ago
CNN briefly reported on this before it was swept under the rug. This link has been shared here before but got little attention https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o6W8H5Z0XAc
e-traiu ago
Wtf, CNN posting truth suddenly?
Astrodreamer ago
The answer is decidedly NO. Can't you just read the very article you post? 5,200 names subscribing to CP. Only 3,500 were crosschecked. Only 264 (not 5,200) were specifically Pentagon-related. Only 20 percent of these 264 people were completely investigated and fewer still were prosecuted.
Beaucephus ago
We pulled the court documents for the only arrest that was made public out of Project Flicker (the investigation you are referencing). https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1650535
brokencookie ago
We're 5,200 people fired and sent to prison?
Arrvee ago
iReport is CNN's anything-goes site where anybody can publish in CNN's name. The source for the number is the Wordpress blog Seeker 401. Its source is a set of stories in the Boston Globe in 2011 reporting on an investigation in 2006-2007.
Pentagon vows action on porn cases
Pentagon vows action on porn cases
These stories do not say that the 5200 had subscriptions.
OhBlindOne ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7n316nGhVo
Just another bit of info about this story.
TheDude2 ago
Perverts can subscribe to child porn? WTF? I don't want to know.
formatist ago
This is sort of far fetched, but maybe not - maybe this is a way that Pentagon employees are kept in check. How do you maintain secrecy among 5000 people? You set up a child porn subscription for each of them, let them know, then tell them a story will run with their name and this information if they ever reveal a state secret. B/c what's worse than jail? Being known in society as a pedo. I just can't see that many people being into child porn, but who knows.
Touchdown50 ago
And the host of those sites were the fbi honey pot probably
fetuspizza ago
Are these individual people, or fake people? One person could be dumping money into 5200 separate accounts, to fund the subscriptions. I think this is more real than 5,200 real people subbing to kiddy porn. Just my .02.
blind_sypher ago
Why would that need to occur? Theres no reason someone would need to do that. They would also require the cooperation of these other people anyways to orchestrate that anyways.
fetuspizza ago
Why would they if they're government employees? Or if they're shell accounts. Hiding your money and using 5,200 different accounts to subscribe to something, its a lot easier to hide money, stay hidden, than to use just one account.
AboveSoBelow ago
Well having the accounts/credentials of 5200 pentagon employees, all being compromised would be a massive scandal also. From how the report read, that wasn't the case.
PepperoniBoni ago
5,200 out of how many total employees? That percentage would be a more interesting statistic to red pill people
micha_ ago
Only one downvote? Now two! People, you HAVE TO READ, before you upvote such BS-claims.
rodental ago
23,000. So more than 20% of employees at the Pentagon are pedos.
OhBlindOne ago
Sauce? Just want to make it easier for people to get the info from the source.
rodental ago
I googled "number of employees Pentagon".
OhBlindOne ago
That's cool and all, just wanted you to give the source right in the comments so people can see where you got your numbers from.
derram ago
https://archive.is/0sHzT | https://vgy.me/WsKYBF.png :
'When the Pentagon child pornography story surfaced in 2010, it was naturally one of those media reports that created a whirlwind of interest and astonishment. '
'Child pornography being linked to the American government has all the hallmarks of being one of the major scandals of the decade. '
'The project began in 2007 and identified more than 5,200 individuals who had subscribed to child pornography websites. '
'Why did Project Flicker end only eight months after it had started, without there being any charges or convictions, despite the fact that buying child pornography is illegal?'
'Yet almost as quickly as the scandal emerged, it disappeared, leaving the nation dumbfounded and none the wiser of its outcome. '
This has been an automated message.
I_have_my_gun_ready ago
I believe 3 people were actually prosecuted for child porn because of this investigation. From what I read, the investigation was closed down because once the president and his advisors found out how prevalent and high ranking the child porn went, his advisors told him that prosecuting all 5200 employees it would topple the government. So he dropped it.
Annon365 ago
Been posted tons of times
AboveSoBelow ago
Good to hear but how are 5200 people at the Pentagon being overlooked? It's not like it was 20-30 instances, it's massive. It appears systemic. Good god!
MolochHunter ago
This I believe is classic operation brownstone shit. "Welcome to the pentagon, here's your PC, with a secret stash of kiddie porn in case you ever step outta line"
They discovered it, started investigating, and maybe came to that conclusion when finding the 'subscriptions' were all or mostly dormant/unused
wearesven ago
This is the point we need to pay more attention to, same with PGate in general. It's way more likely it's all about having blackmail on people for the rest of their lives. Some of these people may be entirely sick and enjoy what they're doing, but the main point is all about power and control, including forcing others to do things extremely heinous as evidence. This might be the entire reason you see some of the more depraved "jokes," because the ones in power are joking about the rituals they've made others perform on camera.
Annon365 ago
I know . it's become clear that the government has been controlled and corrupted by pedophiles for decades, just hope trump and the good guys come through , all we can do it keep trying to expose, keep up the good work
Gorillion ago
I do wonder if this is some form of control though. Dropping CP on someone's computer is a great way to shut them up if they were privy to some massive fuck up in some other area. And it's not like Hillary, Obama and their deep state pedo cronies didn't have a healthy supply of that shit to drop.
As PepperoniBoni says though, what sort of representative ratio is this? Is it weirdly over-represented? Is it focused in one or two particular departments? Or is there a "natural spread" of fuckbags, same as you'd see anywhere else?
AboveSoBelow ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkUfMeAlVeE