If you think about it, Snopes has done a master job of portraying itself as being "factual"/"objective" when it is anything but. It's a branding masterpiece. Before I came across the Podesta emails in Oct last year I completely believed Snopes - without question.
view the rest of the comments →
eyeVoated ago
Their citations for "debunked" include Snopes and a Newspaper. Lol
Disgusted-Lurker ago
I had a friend send me the Snopes "debunking" and that was the end of discussion as far as he was concerned.
I know he didn't read any of the basic facts I presented and I'm pretty certain he never even read the Snopes article.
People are just plain brainwahed and intellectually lazy...
anon_sense ago
If you think about it, Snopes has done a master job of portraying itself as being "factual"/"objective" when it is anything but. It's a branding masterpiece. Before I came across the Podesta emails in Oct last year I completely believed Snopes - without question.
Melitica ago
Interesting that they used to have display ads...but since they are an "official " source...now they don't.
No one bothers to winder how they are paying the bills.