You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

pidgin ago

Good post. I was just browsing on the ICMEC website, and I ran across this little gem. http://www.icmec.org/global-missing-childrens-center/international-parental-child-abduction/

Basically, the page is ICMEC's work in fighting "international parental child abductions' They define this as being when a parent tries to take their child(ren) into another country without proper documentation. Who exactly would be the most likely parents to move their children with insufficient papers? My guess is poor people from war-torn places like Kosovo, Sudan, Libya, and Haiti.

From the page, they are working towards:"A more consistent and uniform implementation of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction." https://assets.hcch.net/upload/conventions/txt28en.pdf

Article 13 jumped out at me as being particularly key to this piece of international law... Again we are most likely dealing with poor people, so the parents can essentially be railroaded into losing custody to either state, and in many cases the children end up in group homes, at least for a period of time.

Also on this page, "In 2010, we co-hosted, along with the Permanent Bureau and the U.S. Department of State, an International Judicial Conference on Cross-Border Family Relocation." You can read it here: https://assets.hcch.net/upload/decl_washington2010e.pdf

Basically, it is just adding a lot more ways for governments to scrutinize and exercise complete control over families. It's weird to me, because I was expecting to find that they were trying to eliminate red tape (as a way of moving in immigrants), but it's all about getting more people involved in family courts wherever they have jurisdiction. To me, this looks like an administrative way to get kids into state/NGO institutions.