@Millennial_Falcon , I think my post complies with rule 2 as it has references for every claim, and it is clearly there. What is missing? You must give reasons because:
On-Demand Explanations
Oops, I meant Rule 1. As you still present no evidence for your thesis. It is pure conjecture. Also, you have changed your premise multiple times (pineal gland = psychic, blood harvesting, stem cells, etc, etc). It's pretty apparent you're making it up as you go.
view the rest of the comments →
jangles ago
@Millennial_Falcon , I think my post complies with rule 2 as it has references for every claim, and it is clearly there. What is missing? You must give reasons because: On-Demand Explanations
Millennial_Falcon ago
Oops, I meant Rule 1. As you still present no evidence for your thesis. It is pure conjecture. Also, you have changed your premise multiple times (pineal gland = psychic, blood harvesting, stem cells, etc, etc). It's pretty apparent you're making it up as you go.
jangles ago
No psychic crap in any of my work