As has been WELL documented on practically every thread here, the panda bear is a notorious Pedophilia reference that has been linked directly to SEVERAL James Alefantis instagram photos.... well guess what?
The person that Hillary Clinton decided to retweet today when she trolled Flynn with the PG reference has a youtube video link under his name and it's a video of a panda bear with it's baby.... check for yourself:
https://twitter.com/PhilippeReines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzRH3iTQPrk&feature=youtu.be
view the rest of the comments →
AreWeSure ago
the panda bear is a notorious Pedophilia reference
among people on this voat.
Not, you know, in reality.
DarkMath ago
AreWeSure wrote: "Not, you know, in reality." meaning we're all imagining the Panda Pedophilia connection. We also imagined the Buck Pedophilia connection. Sigh.......
Panda Eyes a.k.a. Racoon Eyes can be a sign of physical abuse when seen in a child. Children have heads that are disproportionately large for their body size, weak bones and muscles. If they are shaken too hard as would happen in, duh, Shaken Baby Syndrome, the base of their skull can fracture and cerbral-spinal fluid seep out through their eye sockets. This is what it can look like:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Raccoon+Eyes
Every instance of Panda/Racoon Eyes doesn't prove child abuse. It's just one of many signs Pediatricians are trained to look for. Other causes could be drugging a child which I had the unfortunate experience of learning Pedophiles may do in order to break down their inhibitions.
Yes campers Pandas are sometimes associated with Pedophilia. So are Bucks. Bucks are children a Pedophile wants to fuck in the ass on a camping trip. You might have noticed James Alefantis through an act of sheer genius happened to name one of his restaurants Buck's Camping and Fishing............No I'm not making that up. This is the shit show we're in here people. This is how fucking insane this shit show is.
YingYangMom ago
Bingo.
DarkMath ago
Yep, Bingo is right. In fact I think it's even worse. If you scroll up you might see a comment from BackAgain. They write:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1647535/8051872
In case they delete it: "Also are we sure the Panda is a pedophile symbol? I know they talked about CumPanda and such but it doesn't mean its a pedo code it could just be their own little homosexual lingo or something"
I would bet dollars to donuts BackAgain is AreWeSure. Why? AreWeSure in addition to being absolutely 100% sure nothing bad happened, is also a fan of 2 logical fallacies:
Begging the Question.
The Straw Man
So AreWeSure uses Begging the Question and writes "it could just be their own little homosexual lingo", meaning oh you deplorable shit lord, how could you impugn homosexuals. You're a bigot.
Then AreWeSure probably logged in as AreWeSure and tries to browbeat anyone who ever thinks Pandas were ever in the history of the universe associated with Pedophilia.
Is that about right @AreWeSure and @BackAgain?
@ich1baN
BackAgain ago
What in the fuck are you talking about?
I'm so sorry I don't just blindly believe everything someone says. People start saying a "Panda" is code word for pedophilia I ask WHY? Is that too much to ask? Why are a few of you saying Panda is code word for Pedophilia? Evidence is needed. Blindly assuming things does not help the investigation. I'm not just going to blindly believe every single weird word they use is another term for pedophilia
You seem like a nutjob to me
DarkMath ago
"People start saying a "Panda" is code word for pedophilia".......Whoa, back up there pilgrim. It's a code word for pedophilia? You forgot what you wrote above: "the Panda is a pedophile symbol?".
Ok, that's strike two. You can prove you're not a shill if you tell me you'll watch either:
If you're interested in finding the truth surely you'll be able to do 1 or 2, no?
BackAgain ago
Wow you truly are a straight up nutjob
I don't need to prove anything to you
It doesn't make someone a shill because they haven't studied pizzagate in the exact same manner as you have
People like YOU hurt this investigation. All I did was ask "Where did the idea come from that Pandas are a pedophile symbol?" and you started going off on some crazy rant about how I must be some other User and now you claim I must be a shill if I haven't watched George Webb videos. You are crazy. You make other people in the PG community look crazy by assosciation
GET A GRIP
DarkMath ago
"hurt this investigation"......You only get to say that if I knew how to investigate sex crimes. New Flash: I DON'T. That's kind of the point. We're all making this up as we go along. Why?
BECAUSE OUR GOVERNMENT WON'T DO THEIR JOB.
And yes, you actually have to prove you're not a shill. They've sent a 100 shills here. We all get suspicious when we see the following.
If you get two out of three it's bad. You just got three out of three. If you followed this thing for 3 months you'd understand.
Do I still think you're a shill? I'm about 90% sure you're NOT. That's up from 50%.
Do you think the Clinton Foundation may have committed a crime during their relief work in Haiti?
BackAgain ago
lol I think Pizzagate was real. If I was a shill I would not be supporting the Pizzagate discussion. It does not make me a shill because I wont watch whatever videos you try to make me watch. It does not make me a shill for questioning the validity of the statement that Pandas are a symbol for pedophilia.
This investigation being taken seriously depends on us to not spread false information. The more false information spread around the easier it is for the opposition to discredit everything. For real discussion to happen we need people who ask "Hold up guys are we sure this is true?". Just blindly accepting things doesn't help In the future if someone asks a question itd be in the investigations best interest for you to not immediately jump to conclusions and attack them claiming they are a paid shill. It could easily turn people from being supporters to people who don't give a fuck. I'm done talking to you
DarkMath ago
"false information"........Interesting. Don't you think watching Clinton Cash and George Webb would help you better define what information is false?
It's now 95% because you don't need me to tell you that.
"The more false information spread around the easier it is for the opposition to discredit everything."........Classic. That's very "Hillary Clinton accuse your opponent of the crime you committed" of you.
The Clinton Foundation GANG RAPED Haiti. And you don't think that's relevant here? There's increasing evidence the Clinton Foundation was involved in CHILD TRAFFICKING........and you don't think it's relevant here?
You don't even know what a Brownstone operation is do you? You'd think an honest investigator would want to find out everything they could. Not you. ;-)
You're a shill..........Dude that's pathetic.
YingYangMom ago
Good eye. We all know he's a troll, but you've done a great job at exposing the tactic used.