You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BackToBlack ago

How do you guys think we can make this go viral so that normies can hear it for themselves? How about a separate video that first plays the original clip followed by this one (so that they know what's that about)? People should see this and judge for themselves - that's what the establishment is so afraid of, that's why they're censoring our boards.Our only strength over them is that there's more of us - let's use it to our advantage and spam everywhere about pizzagate.

VieBleu ago

a meme and it should have 1) the Efit criminal sketch 2) The Breitbart Tweet 3) Voice Comparison just the evidence.

cky_stew ago

The efit sketch was debunked. There is no proven link.

Not to mention it's ridiculous to suggest a skinny high profile politician would personally sneak into a holiday resort to commit an abduction.

neurofluxation ago

The efit sketch was debunked. There is no proven link.

Uhh... Other than they look fucking identical (down to the face mole)?
Yes, it's supposed to be of the same person... But how the living fuck do two people who "saw the same person" make such completely different efits.. Right down to different face shape?! They don't.

Not to mention it's ridiculous to suggest a skinny high profile politician would personally sneak into a holiday resort to commit an abduction.

Why is this ridiculous? What about this is unfathomable? Skinny guys rape and steal kids... Just as much as average or fat guys I would imagine... People of "power" have been FOUND GUILTY of similar crimes...

The fact that he has a lot of power and pulls a lot of strings...?! Oh, he must be innocent then...

I'm not sure what you are trying to do, but you are doing it terribly. I suggest you actually put some thought into why you are even here...

cky_stew ago

Firstly, they look vaguely similar. Regarding John. What face mole are you talking about? Second picture looks nothing at all like Tony Podesta, only similarity is that the picture makes him look kinda round.

They saw the same person, at the exact same time. To suggest they both saw two different people in the same place at the same time while they were stood next to each other - but didn't notice the other guy, is just a totally ludicrous suggestion to make.

Much more likely that efit descriptions aren't all that accurate, right?

You're suggesting a high profile politician personally abducted a girl with his out of shape brother, while flat out ignoring the fact that the origin of the sketches suggests it was only one person. Why the fuck would he risk that? There is no evidence he was even in the country at the time, except that he didn't answer his emails - which happens all the fucking time with a travelling politician. Oh and it also happens to be the most high profile case of child abduction in the last 20 years - what a coincidence! Did you check all the abduction cases and witness descriptions of other cases for efits that vaguely resemble him too? Or just this one?

Why am I here? I like to read about pizzagate, im not a denier at all, most of this has substance behind it - but the maddy thing is such outstretched bullshit and makes the whole movement look stupid when people talk about it while ignoring that aspects that I've highlighted.

If you can't handle me questioning aspects of pizzagate, and would prefer it to be an echochamber, then just downvote me and move on -but i'm going to question and call bullshit on weak links regardless of whether or not it hurts the narrative. Sorry!

neurofluxation ago

Firstly... Let me address the mole... http://i.imgur.com/KjxohNn.jpg

You're suggesting that they don't look alike... I disagree, can you not see the OUTSTANDING similarity between the efits and the Podesta's?

Much more likely that efit descriptions aren't all that accurate, right?

Just as likely as it was the Podesta's... right?

You're suggesting a high profile politician personally abducted a girl with his out of shape brother

Yes, if not M. McCann - then other kids definitely.

while flat out ignoring the fact that the origin of the sketches suggests it was only one person

Who told you about the efits? MSM. Who owns and runs the MSM?
Look. They risk this shit because it's what they do. They've been doing it for years... It's been reported on for decades. It's only now that it's becoming more common knowledge that the "powers that be" do these strange things (irregardless of legality)... Just look at Bohemian Grove or the very very secretive Bilderberg meetings... Why do any of this weird shit?

There is no evidence he was even in the country at the time, except that he didn't answer his emails

So, to confirm, there's no evidence that he was NOT in the country at that time either then.

Did you check all the abduction cases and witness descriptions of other cases for efits that vaguely resemble him too? Or just this one?

I have been researching this diabolical shit for years... years and years... I have reserved my right to judge the stories until now. You are really missing the bigger picture if you think this is all about the Podesta's. This is worldwide.

I just think that, instead of attacking what I believe, do your own research and come to your own conclusions... I'm not here to argue and go mental at people, but when there is SO MUCH circumstantial evidence as there is in this case, it simply cannot be ignored. Podesta's aside...

cky_stew ago

Who told you about the efits? MSM.

Huh? So by that logic, the whole thing is bullshit and you can't take the sketches for granted.

Dude - it sounds like you just want to believe, and are accepting extremely outstretched possibilities as fact - while at the same time brushing off my arguments with "you can't prove otherwise" and "but MSM said that". Which are weak arguments that you are only using in your favour where appropriate and I could use those exact same arguments back at you, but I won't sink to that level.

Don't accept this shit as fact, do more research - or at least when you spread that message, acknowledge that this is two drawings of the same person, and there are other flaws in this theory. Because they are.

This theory is the biggest stretch of imagination in the whole pizzagate theory - everything else is evidence based.

neurofluxation ago

I did not research for years just to say "msm said it, so it's bullshit". But look around you dude....
Shit is going down.

You didn't even try to respond to my other bits. You attacked me for saying MSM is bullshit - which it is, they have been found out spinning, lying and generally stirring shit up for DECADES.

Don't accept this shit as fact, do more research

You aren't listening to me. I have researched, for years. PizzaGate is just the latest term for something that has been ongoing for years.

acknowledge that this is two drawings of the same person

I simply cannot do that, because even though we've been TOLD that this is the same person - I'm not that fucking stupid.

This theory is the biggest stretch of imagination in the whole pizzagate theory

Why? Madeline McCann was just another kid... Just like the rest... Why is this so outlandish...? Just because of Podesta's potential involvement...? How many rapists, child molesters and criminals are in the senate? In positions of power? It's no different.

The reason I am saying "well, the opposite is true" is because that's correct... Your own arguments just state that "podesta wasn't contactable" - which doesn't prove he wasn't in the country.

Edit: I'm assuming that by the sudden influx of downvotes you either have a secondary account and have downvoted me through it - or you are part of a distraction network... Either way, I couldn't care less - I have said what I wanted to. Internet points mean fuck all.

cky_stew ago

You're picking and choosing what MSM is telling you only where it supports your theory.

I was telling you to do more research on the connection between Podesta/McCann - because the drawing being vaguely similar to one of the podesta brothers is literally all you've got. That's not enough to justify the ludicrous suggestions that come with the rest of this theory. Not for me anyway.

neurofluxation ago

You're picking and choosing what MSM is telling you only where it supports your theory.

No. I don't pick and choose any of it. I ignore it all.

I could drop the McCann link with the Podesta's and WikiLeaks emails completely and there is still TONS of circumstantial evidence linking Podesta's to a bunch of shady shit.