http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/112525257
By the way, I know this account is brand new.
I was banned previously due to mods on here picking and choosing who, not what to delete. I'm posting this one time, and I already know it's going to get deleted because I have identified who/what my previous legitimate handle is (used to be) on here.
Best way to counter the mods from now on out (for me IMHO) is to not accrue contribution points anymore to just get banned again after all that time and hard work; just create another account. It's an attempt to silence our voice and I refuse to let it happen. Everyone on here knows SOME, not all, mods are pedo-friendly enablers that delete and ban people for whatever reason they like, without legitimate reason/s when you counter their argument.
view the rest of the comments →
podestakilledmyson ago
it does actually seem like a coincidence.. its not even an interesting one..
lurch991 ago
Ah okay. I guess the podestas and the clintons really do have a strange obsession with pizza and its not a satanic child trafficking pedophilia ring after all.
Go on home guys, all of this is just a "coincidence".
podestakilledmyson ago
the difference is that the podestas and clintons already had ties to an elite pedophile ring without even looking at the codewords. The strangely worded e-mails do not make up the base of accusations... they are only used to supplement the stronger evidence available, such as the ARTWORK OF CHILD ABUSE and LINKS TO ACTUAL CHILD TRAFFICKING IN HAITI. An unrelated cartoon, however has -----ZERO----- connections to any pedophile ring so they are much more likely to be coincidences. of course you will find references in everything if you look hard enough, so maybe you could go check out a "rocks on mars" forum to see if you can find faces of podesta..
lurch991 ago
Oh okay! So what you're telling me is half the shitposting on the front page that is not directly pizzagate related should be deleted and posted on "v/rocks on mars" instead but faggots like you still upvoat and get to the front flaired as "IMPORTANT" or "NEW EVIDENCE"?
aye aye, cap'n.
podestakilledmyson ago
i dont know why you're generalizing me as part of that crowd.. i never upvoated anything that says "important" or "new evidence". in fact im always critical of shit like that
lurch991 ago
Because you're being ignorant and senile, that's why. If you have any reason or logic at all, you know 50% of the stuff on here is NOT "directly" pizzagate related. In yet, it makes front page every single day and people eat it up like its something of importance. I can find 5 post right now that per the rules, should not be there. They should have been deleted before they made the highlights because they offer no value aside from entertainment, gaslighting, or complete irrelevance.
podestakilledmyson ago
again, you're lumping me in with the crowd and assuming I think the same way as them. the content you are referring to thats not pizza related is the kind of shit I hate.. i wish they didnt post that stuff.