Trump outed Bill Clinton as pedophile during debate after meeting with child abuse victims in october 2016. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by CICERO_ROARS

I haven't seen these two clips circulate in the #PizzaGate investigation but believe they should be seen as evidence that Trump was/is going after the Clintons as pedophiles and cover up of sexual abuse of minors. As I don't live in the US I do not know whether they were ever aired on TV since none of these clips has any corporate branding.

The first clip is from a press conference (october 2016?) that Trump had with four women who claims to have been molested by Bill Clinton, one at the age of 12 - also accusing Hillary Clinton of covering up, bullying and laughing the matter off publicly. It's a short and not so well visited press conference just hours before a Clinton/Trump debate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpDC66Y3kAU

The second clip is from the actual debate with Hillary Clinton later the same day after Trump met with the victims. In the debate Trump exposes Bill Clinton as a pedophile in his presence, calling him "the worst abuser in the history of politics". Hillary Clinton immediately changes subject and alludes the issue.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsMYVEVapUo

This happened just ~weeks/month before the #PizzaGate hashtag trended and should be considered as an evidence that Trump was/is going after the Clintons for involvement in child sex abuse.

So was this ever aired in US media? In any case it should be shared...

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

CavemanCult ago

Just a thought, if what he said was false, wouldn't they have been able to sue for slander?

V____Z ago

That's always been David Seaman's contention: he's always calling out Podesta for being a pedocriminal, he's showing the world that he obviously has a case, or else Podesta would make a big deal out of his innocence and sue.

Disgusted-Lurker ago

Same for Jimmy Comet....if he's so fucking innocent, why isn't he suing?

His former (current?) flame, Brock, is spending something like $40mln to combat "fake news".

Wouldn't the best way to shut it down and clear your name be via slander and libel lawsuits...?? That's what I would do if I were innocent.

Discovery is a bitch, boys...

Poot_McGarvey ago

This is true but defamation suits are also notoriously difficult to win when the person who is defamed is a public figure.

You have to prove not only that the information is objectively false, you also have to prove that the publisher published the material knowing it was false OR published the material with a reckless disregard for the truth.

So you basically have to prove that they were malicious, and not just ill informed and stupid. Being wrong, ill informed, and stupid is basically a valid defense for publishing slanderous shit about people (when they are a public figure, anyway)

Disgusted-Lurker ago

I totally understand that it would be a tough battle to actually collect damages on.

But making a public legal spectacle of it would in essence clear their reputation, regardless of exact outcome.

They don't want skeletons to come tumbling out of the closet. So they will continue with the fake news straw man....