I haven't seen these two clips circulate in the #PizzaGate investigation but believe they should be seen as evidence that Trump was/is going after the Clintons as pedophiles and cover up of sexual abuse of minors. As I don't live in the US I do not know whether they were ever aired on TV since none of these clips has any corporate branding.
The first clip is from a press conference (october 2016?) that Trump had with four women who claims to have been molested by Bill Clinton, one at the age of 12 - also accusing Hillary Clinton of covering up, bullying and laughing the matter off publicly. It's a short and not so well visited press conference just hours before a Clinton/Trump debate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpDC66Y3kAU
The second clip is from the actual debate with Hillary Clinton later the same day after Trump met with the victims. In the debate Trump exposes Bill Clinton as a pedophile in his presence, calling him "the worst abuser in the history of politics". Hillary Clinton immediately changes subject and alludes the issue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsMYVEVapUo
This happened just ~weeks/month before the #PizzaGate hashtag trended and should be considered as an evidence that Trump was/is going after the Clintons for involvement in child sex abuse.
So was this ever aired in US media?
In any case it should be shared...
view the rest of the comments →
CavemanCult ago
Just a thought, if what he said was false, wouldn't they have been able to sue for slander?
lostinthevalley ago
I saw the question about suing answered elsewhere by someone apparently in the know. He said it's very hard to prove a negative. If you say "So-and-so molested a child on this date at this time at this place" then the accused can sue if, for example, they have an alibi or if they have a video of said location which shows it was another person doing the crime. But if you just say "He is a pedo" how does he prove he is not? That he's dated adult women, married one, has never been accused of it before? None of that is proof.