this is not me but somebody on a FB Group i'm in who posted tbe links and text. the video is pretty disturbing but not cp. not sure about whether it's JPs voice Im not a good expert on that stuff but wanted to leave it here in case it warrants further investigstion. note she did find CP on this companys discord chat!
++++++++×××××××××××××××××
! I wanted to share a bit of information I stumbled upon today that I think is evidence of John Podesta's involvement in the child abuse ring. There is a website www.worldcorpo.net that seems to be a whistleblower site containing graphic videos of various abusive acts. One of which is called "Fatherhood," which is a shakey hand-held camera (can't really see anything but the audio is clear enough to understand what they are saying) recording a man screaming at a child "What's my name? Say my name!" in what I believe to be John Podesta's voice. If you listen closely, the child screams/answers "John." Another video where it sounds EXACTLY like him is "Each." Here are the links to both videos as well as an interview with him so you can compare voices. http://worldcorpo.net/content/video/fatherhood.webm http://worldcorpo.net/content/video/each.mp4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0wa2MhPkfA&t=115s Thoughts???
view the rest of the comments →
sore_ass_losers ago
Is 'sounds like him' evidence in court?
ArcherMcTaco ago
sort of. It's been used before. see the Trayvon Martin case. It requires experts but is possible to get thrown out. It's damning as fuck though. Find the kid who said it and you got a slam dunk. Again, reasonable doubt.
Also, I'm not clickin that shit to find out..... Fuck this case gets more and more fucked.
cakeoflightylight ago
OK, I am not a licensed attorney but I graduated from law school. It could theoretically be introduced as evidence. IF they ever did get that in front of a jury for introduction I would be kind of shocked unless it was a slam dunk in the first place. If it's real, you can believe it will be introduced and it will get in. Somehow though, I don't see John Podesta ever having a jury trial.
ArcherMcTaco ago
Yup. The only problem is the whole 'reasonable doubt' thing (keep in mind R. Kelly got off after a video of him pissing on a 14 year old was released because of 'reasonable dount'). The outrage and lack of love for Podesta from the public may be enough for people to not buy the 'reasonable doubt' defense. Normies aren't buying the pizzagate is a lie bullshit, but are too uncomfortable to keep up.
cakeoflightylight ago
Yes but considering the other evidence there is against him, if that video is him, it would only be one piece of evidence anyway. They're going to have a huge case on their hands against him. If he doesn't burn soon, I think the people will be fed up enough to take matters into their own hands. We cannot live in a world where people continue to get away with murdering children because of some legal issues. We need to call out the FBI if they don't do something soon. Kids dying daily.
ArcherMcTaco ago
I agree. Even if he got off he'd be marked. If the judge went soft they would become suspect. If media went soft they would be suspect. It would be a domino effect. The defense of "privacy so I don't have to tell any of you what any of this shit is so deal with it and you don't have proof cause software and I ain't gonna do shit to help you prove me innocent or guilty" wouldn't fly with a jury.