Voat member IShallNotFear requested a full topic about this subject. I was hesitant at first because armyseer sock accounts kept spamming up the place about me but after all the creepy new artwork coming out I think it is important to look back at some of this stuff. I think the average voat user can simply use their eyes in this case to say whether they consider what they see art or degeneracy.

Here is a write-up by James Pinkerton about their art in the Sensation exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art. It is relevant to Pizzagate because not only did Hillary Clinton defended the museum from calls to stop funding it taxpayer dollars over the artwork she did it while facing reelection. Ironically, the calls to defund the artwork were because of sacrilegious artwork (dung on the Virgin Mary) and not the mannequin child porn it contained and other creepy shit.

Featured Art from:

Jake and Dinos Chapman: Their Sensation Exhibit "Tragic Anatomies" Their Instagram Called the murder of the toddler James Bulger "a good social service" Them saying "children aren't human yet." Artwork of theirs branded paedo-pornographic called "piggyback" This one in particular creeps me the fuck out

Damien Hirst Tony Podesta is a great fan of his work.

Marcus Harvey: Created a giant portrait of child killer Myra Hindley made from miniature children's handprints. I wish I was making this stuff up. Myra

Tracey Emin Claims to be a former rape victim. Wrote a book with the Chapman brothers that looks pederastic as fuck. An example of her Tate artwork. Book she and the Chapman bros wrote "The Fourth Sex"

Full Pinkerton Article

But the real outrage is the work of Jake and Dinos Chapman. Their artistic oeuvre is naked girls. They have taken department-store mannequins of little girls, festooned them with penises, and then added vaginas and anuses--the kind you might expect to see on a blow-up sex doll--in random places over their faces and bodies. The wall cards attempt to explain all this away with folderol about the perils of genetic engineering, but these two artists were surely creepy before they ever heard of DNA. Indeed, the sci-fi stuff is just a cover for pandering to pedophiles, as the museum well knows. The caption for "Tragic Anatomies" asks the following: "What would the world be like if we were freed of all sexual inhibition? Do we falsely deny the existence of sexuality in children?" Why haven't the media reported on that? Is it because they've been focused on the feces? Maybe, but I think there's another reason. The critics and commentators don't want the real raw truth about this exhibit to get out, because they know that even they can't publicly defend Hustler-type photos or kiddie porn. Moreover, now that Giuliani's likely opponent in next year's U.S. Senate race, Hillary Rodham Clinton, has declared herself against his effort to yank the museum's funding, pressies don't want to undercut her by describing precisely what she wants to keep paying for. So they discuss the dung briefly and then move on to safer discussions of the 1st Amendment.