I'm going to go low since money buys power: and say Epstein..again. I just don't see Soros every getting charged with any crime ever. When you donate $ to half the worlds politicians, you are the one deciding who gets convicted and who doesn't. Case in point: The overwhelming evidence (factual hard evidence) of Clinton email corruption/lie to congress. - This played out on live TV, in full Public view. And She hasn't been charged.
This played out on live TV, in full Public view. And She hasn't been charged.
I lean to agreeing with you. My mind is boggled that Clinton wasn't pursued, but can't help but wonder if things will change now on that since she doesn't have a fancy title anymore. I think Soros will remain untouched. That guy has quite the identity. He knows what he is doing - and I doubt he will be charged. Barred from the US - maybe.
I agree. The problem with Soros is that he has people EVERYWHERE. Not to mention his family members like his son at Berkeley. Soros probably doesn't even run the show anymore and just supplies the cash. More and more I feel like he has just taken on the role of the "public scapegoat." Its highly unlikely that he's directing all this. He's just an easy target for conspiracy sleuths. Something like the Bilderberg group is doing all the ordering.
I liked that FBI anon made the distinction that the Clinton machine wasn't at the top of the ladder. They were part of it, but there were other big players. It's with that, I'll call the Clinton Foundation and the CGI will fall - hence the Clintons will be the richest to go down.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed on Weiner's laptop. I have a hunch it has most everything on there. There had to be substantial happenings on there for them to re open the investigation the way they did during the election.
view the rest of the comments →
Likeitirish ago
I'm going to go low since money buys power: and say Epstein..again. I just don't see Soros every getting charged with any crime ever. When you donate $ to half the worlds politicians, you are the one deciding who gets convicted and who doesn't. Case in point: The overwhelming evidence (factual hard evidence) of Clinton email corruption/lie to congress. - This played out on live TV, in full Public view. And She hasn't been charged.
logjam ago
I lean to agreeing with you. My mind is boggled that Clinton wasn't pursued, but can't help but wonder if things will change now on that since she doesn't have a fancy title anymore. I think Soros will remain untouched. That guy has quite the identity. He knows what he is doing - and I doubt he will be charged. Barred from the US - maybe.
Likeitirish ago
I agree. The problem with Soros is that he has people EVERYWHERE. Not to mention his family members like his son at Berkeley. Soros probably doesn't even run the show anymore and just supplies the cash. More and more I feel like he has just taken on the role of the "public scapegoat." Its highly unlikely that he's directing all this. He's just an easy target for conspiracy sleuths. Something like the Bilderberg group is doing all the ordering.
logjam ago
I liked that FBI anon made the distinction that the Clinton machine wasn't at the top of the ladder. They were part of it, but there were other big players. It's with that, I'll call the Clinton Foundation and the CGI will fall - hence the Clintons will be the richest to go down.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed on Weiner's laptop. I have a hunch it has most everything on there. There had to be substantial happenings on there for them to re open the investigation the way they did during the election.