This happened in 2009. It was an isolated case of a pedo furry working for a politician, it doesn't seem related to the fruition of Pizzagate.
As someone who's been in the furry community, there is a lot of strange lingo and dark sides to the fandom, but I don't think this version of panda is as relevant, nor the story itself.
We have to keep in mind that thes epedophile rings have been operating for a long time. Pizzagate didn't just start when we discovered it through the Wikileaks Podesta emails, it's been ongoing for years no doubt. There is a lot of evidence that many of leaders at the local, state and federal level are involved in these types of activities so at this point it may all be relevant.
Thanks for being civil. These pedo rings have been going on for a very long time, I certainly agree with that, and I find it sickening how pizzagate is being pushed as false so fervently. I just don't believe this instance really ties in to the current events of pizzagate considering it was almost 2 decades ago, and he was fired after. I mostly just don't see him identifying as a panda relevant to the actual issue of propositioning a child, which seemed to be the original question asked of this post.
I want the sleuthers to stay vigilant, and digging up the past isn't a bad thing, but keeping it on a track that really digs deep and doesn't end with a single sicko who actually got what he deserved. I want leads that blow more holes open until it's undeniable even by those who are too diluted by MSM to see it.
With that said those who dig are very brave for doing so. I wouldn't risk it, so I thank them for putting themselves on the line.
view the rest of the comments →
cannabiscuit ago
This happened in 2009. It was an isolated case of a pedo furry working for a politician, it doesn't seem related to the fruition of Pizzagate.
As someone who's been in the furry community, there is a lot of strange lingo and dark sides to the fandom, but I don't think this version of panda is as relevant, nor the story itself.
IPleadThe2nd ago
We have to keep in mind that thes epedophile rings have been operating for a long time. Pizzagate didn't just start when we discovered it through the Wikileaks Podesta emails, it's been ongoing for years no doubt. There is a lot of evidence that many of leaders at the local, state and federal level are involved in these types of activities so at this point it may all be relevant.
cannabiscuit ago
Thanks for being civil. These pedo rings have been going on for a very long time, I certainly agree with that, and I find it sickening how pizzagate is being pushed as false so fervently. I just don't believe this instance really ties in to the current events of pizzagate considering it was almost 2 decades ago, and he was fired after. I mostly just don't see him identifying as a panda relevant to the actual issue of propositioning a child, which seemed to be the original question asked of this post.
I want the sleuthers to stay vigilant, and digging up the past isn't a bad thing, but keeping it on a track that really digs deep and doesn't end with a single sicko who actually got what he deserved. I want leads that blow more holes open until it's undeniable even by those who are too diluted by MSM to see it.
With that said those who dig are very brave for doing so. I wouldn't risk it, so I thank them for putting themselves on the line.
crazimal ago
Yifff yifff isolated
Unrelated yifff yifff
Dark sides yifff
Yifff yifff much edgyneckbeardiness
Yifffy fruition bro
cannabiscuit ago
Am gril btw