There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
party1981 ago
Thank you. I will check her out. I think 911 was Mossad.
bopper ago
The controlled demolition theory spawned the 911 truth movement. This was possibly anticipated by the perps. At any rate the movement became so popular that it was infiltrated. That's why it's so non-taboo to talk about it. It is now very safely controlled opposition, to keep people from the truth.
The movement despises Dr. Judy Wood (for good reason). She is taboo, maligned, trashed, and has no Wiki page (and she should). Jessie Ventura likes her, but was shut up by Alex Jones when he brought her up on Jones' show. Even Fetzer has opposed her (Mr. Freethinker ... although I do like him on some things).
If one can ignore the sensational aspects (they can be off-putting) of the below clip, it is a fairly good intro to Dr. Wood. https://vimeo.com/53775705
samhara ago
There are other names, I cannont remember at this time. People were also viciously attacked for "No Planes at the Pentagon" which in retrospect is extremely obvious.
John Judge outed himself as a controlled-op over the Pentagon Plane issue /~05. He was a central figure in the control of the JFK research group for over 40 years. He's gone now. A very "nice" and extremely likable man - certain varieties always are.. They fought against you on two fronts: The Pentagon event an the "controlled demolition" observation.
I figured later that they do whatever they can, in their power, to slow down the realization of the true narrative in the awareness of the population. They work on the leaders of research and hijack the followers [ people who read and follow the research but don't do it themselves].