There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
FuckReddit69 ago
Regular bombs, except they werent regular they were condensed 100x of normal bombs. And yes... these bombs form mushroom clouds just like fake nukes do.
gAvenger ago
Condensed bombs, massive fireball, radioactive residue.
So a uranium bomb basically.
I believe they were real nukes only because the science is pretty clear here. Occam's razor literally comes into effect.
The big picture of evidence and scientific theory supports the atom bomb idea.
It just a uranium cap in a rifles chamber hitting a uranium anvil. It's a heavy element. It release energy in the form of a big shockwave and fireball with a br of radiation. It wasn't that big. Mostly heat energy, fireball, fire. Most Hiroshima building were weak construction.
As for H bombs, I mean, the bikini still footage might be fake. Who knows?
FuckReddit69 ago
If your going the "occam's razor" route, you have to at least use it right.
Occam's razor actually suggests that nukes were/are hoaxed in order to give a super power more perceived power and to end wars before they start. The science might be there but that doesnt make nukes real and practical.
If you look at the whole story of the Manhattan project, everything just screams BS. Its a nice fairy tale happy ending that turned out just swell for the Allies. Convenient they had Freemason Einstein solve their Nuclear dilemma on the last minute, constructed a Hyper-bomb with said science and won the war for them with just 2 drops. Occam's razor suggests that its way cheaper and easier to just hoax the thing instead of actually building it using untested cutting edge experimental physics.
Almost everything we were taught about WW2 is complete shitbull. From Hitler to the holohoax, you have been spoon fed garbage since your pre-k ball-Earth indoctrination began before you can even say MaMa.
It's entirely plausable, even probable that the Nuke hoax was carried out as one of the biggest successful psyops in human history. Governments lie with impunity to perpetuate whatever agenda they have on the table. It really shouldnt be a surprise to you or anyone even remotely awake.
gAvenger ago
It's possible, but I've studied college physics and seen tons of Hiroshima evidence first hand. That uranium can make a nuclear reaction, and that the allies could have had one (Hiroshima bomb is not big deal, pretty small a-bomb) is not unreasonable and fits the existing evidence strongly.
The fake chimneys at Auschwitz are different.
JastheMace ago
You've seen 'WW2 in color' right. Soooo, they gave thousands of Joe Blow soldiers cameras that film in color with a higher picture resolution than the camera they put on a plane to film the first ever nuclear explosion used in combat that scientists will want to study? A mushroom cloud superimposed on top of the first one creates the low picture resolution because they had to overlap the film in those days. No radioactive wasteland for a half life of how much?