Is Wikileaks Threatening to Release 9/11 Files Unless The FBI Carries Through With Pizzagate Arrests (pizzagate)

submitted ago by party1981

There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/

This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).

Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":

http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png

Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."

People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html

Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.

Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.

Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?

Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?

Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.

WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

heretolearn ago

um...fuck destabilization. let the whole truth come out. we need destabilized shit to happen. otherwise it's just more of the same bullshit dressed in sunday clothing.

edit: just wanna say, this thread has sparked some great info and conversation. thanks for posting op.

nomorepepperoni ago

Don't know about you, but I'd rather not become the country who collapses into a nightmare that other countries want to prop up on one side or the other and fight over, like we've been doing to Middle Eastern countries.

If FBIAnon was serious about the extent of this, it needs to be a controlled demolition that eventually does root all the swamp dwellers out, rather than an overt desk flip.

YingYangMom ago

Don't know about you, but I'd rather not become the country who collapses into a nightmare that other countries want to prop up on one side or the other and fight over, like we've been doing to Middle Eastern countries.

I think it's good to have this feeling in a way. It makes us feel more empathic towards other less powerful countries and the 'unfair' fates they've been forced to live and endure. Somehow, Qaddafi, Hussein and Assad don't seem as despotic and as tyrannical as they once did.

party1981 ago

Of course they're not that bad. They're bad, of course, the same way we all are.

But they also become targets for total exploitation from the CIA and Soros.

2impendingdoom ago

But they are put in by the CIA, for the purpose of being exploited or later taken out. Saddam Hussain kept 3 different factions reined in better than what's there now (chaos) and we know he had mustard gas because Rumsfeld sold it to him in the 80's. I was told this by an ex-marine, I don't have a source but I don't think its farfetched.

party1981 ago

I heard that same thing. I think the gas was discovered around 2013. A lot of people haven't heard of this. It's funny because it turns out Saddam really did have WMD. Nobody talks about this (it's kind of irrelevant - neocon/CIA topples and exploitation of Middle East countries is a horrible idea either way).

2impendingdoom ago

but the anthrax, the aluminum tubes, the mobile units, the yellow cake was all bullshit, but the gas was okay, because anyone who looked into it would have found the Rumsfeld connection.