New BBC article attacks Reallygraceful, Pizzagate (pizzagate)

submitted ago by hyderflare

Another hatchet job:

Despite rumours, there's no evidence of a paedophile ring on YouTube - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-38829249

The main thrust of the article challenges the claim of a pedo ring on YouTube. However, pizzagate is addressed directly in a central few paragraphs.

So, Pizzagate is, apparently, an 'invented allegation', 'discredited rumours [which] began life as a politically motivated plot by Donald Trump supporters.' The article then predictably blames users for the armed gunman episode, and claimed people '"projected" hidden paedophile signals onto publicly available photos and other material.'

We need Ben Swann back on the air ASAP.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Piscina ago

What do you expect from the BBC? They protected Saville and never report on Prince Andrew's association with Epstein.

Bill_Murrays_Sandals ago

We should let [email protected] know why the article is wrong

Also in regards to Saville cover-up that was ordered by Mark thompson - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10512203/Former-BBC-boss-Mark-Thompson-lied-over-Savile-evidence-Nick-Pollard-claims.html

Mark now works at New York times and is covering up pizzagate

samhara ago

Waste of time; they know exactly what they are doing. Ignore it. Think of it as trolling and just expose them .