You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

virtuous_pedophobe ago

I think this constant shill-calling of everybody over anything is pretty annoying.

Seaman is certainly no researcher and is sloppy, lazy and not very exact when it comes to facts (many reporters are like that).

But AFAIK a "shill" is defined as somebody who intentionally misleads.

A typical example would be Jack White who (successfully) derailed JFK researchers into looking into fuzzy images while there was tons of excellent other evidence available (autopsy, witness statements, etc.), he also discredited the whole community by pushing the "moon hoax".

I don't see how Seaman is doing any thing like that.

  • He generally puts the focus where it hurts (Pegasus museum, etc) even though he tends to get details wrong (image metadata)
  • He does not push crazy nonsense like the "moon hoax", on the contrary, he explained how such disinfo campaigns work by using the "flat earth" as an example
  • He was on pizzagate pretty much from the beginning

So yeah, he has his problems, but I fail to see how he is a shill.

strix-varia ago

I would like to see one person on the planet who knows the truth. No one does, no even the degenerates at the top. They don't even know about every little thing. Yeah, DS has problems, but don't we all, and I too, fail to see how he is a shill. It wastes time dissing him. We love to point the finger if it doesn't suit our agenda and always have three fingers pointing back. Disinfo is everywhere.