You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

oresd ago

Alex Jones gets derided in the media, but more often than not the guy is completely spot on. That Rogan podcast was quite good and recommended for everyone... but listen to the whole thing. Note just pizzagate stuff. The US is being hijacked, and he's been reporting on it non-stop for years.

We need more Alex Jones types out there.

Alex should hire David Seaman.

nomorepepperoni ago

Only if those Alex Jones types have a more grounded co-host who can bring him back to Earth every now and then to explain to normies how he got from A to NWO (like Joe Rogan was doing, but with stronger reins).

What we need are more Ben Swann types, who focus more on provable facts contrary to "the narrative" and asking hard questions.

Except without being threatened off, of course.

IPleadThe2nd ago

I agree! I am a loyal listener to Alex Jones and sometimes I get irritated when he gets far off track or too excited and fails to follow through with a topic. It was awesome having Joe to continually reign him in and keep him on track. Those two were great together!

oresd ago

They were indeed great because Joe fact checked him and then suddenly you were like "shit, this seems real!"

lude ago

I cannot agree with this more.

anubic ago

I personally feel David should remain on his own for as long as he possibly can. I say this only because Alex isn't what he used to be, and what I mean by that is: because of the entire Infowars 'empire' he's got going now, one must understand and be able to see that there are just some places Alex is not willing to go, no matter what evidence and reason is set in front of him. There's too much at stake for him. Also, I'm not entirely convinced he's not being funded by the Council for National Policy. But David doesn't have the weight of millions of viewers/listeners on top of potentially millions of dollars worth of merchandise and subscriptions to sell. It would be dope to see them in an interview like this one though. I'd watch it.

shoosh ago

I'm with you on this one. Something is off, kinda like milk that's on the edge of its expiration date.

He pushes the word "patriotic" in the same phrase as political parties and that's where he makes his big mistake. The American founding fathers, and all others who knew shit about anything would advise people not to be patriotic to your party, but be patriotic to the nation and the well-being of the citizens.

People get brainwashed into thinking patriotism means standing behind a party to do the right thing for the citizens, and it ends up a corporate owned mess, rather than true free enterprise for the people, using lobbyists who are paid by the corporations as a liaison and serve the corporation for financial gain for THEM. Politicians and their circles (cia, military,fbi,cps) are used as puppets for them, when they get too out of balance, politicians who end up making financial deals within corporations and ''foundations'' to further their finances and power.

Most of it is very misguided patriotism that has kept people in the dark, fed only propaganda while North America has seen social decline dramatically in my lifetime. That's why I'm an independent.