You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

IPleadThe2nd ago

I found it odd that initial reports stated that all of the child victims were turned over to DCF. None of this kids came from families who were able to resume custody of them? It appeared that either ALL of the child victims had come from the DCF system or were trafficked from sompleace else. How else could it be explained that none of the kids had available family. This needs to be checked into. California is notorious of having a completely half assed child welfare system with LA being the worst of the worst. They are continually sued for their incompetencies.

Fateswebb ago

The video report I saw did say that aft least one of the kids parents were looking for her...

lude ago

Is the article saying they were PLACED into the care of DCF or were they TAKEN from the care of the DCF (where they were being abused)? I am not necessarily understanding. Can someone clarify.

IPleadThe2nd ago

That's what i have been trying to decipher. It says they were all placed in DCF care after having been rescued, but why wouldn't they be placed back with their families/parents? The only reasons that all of these children were placed with DCF instead of family is because they were already in DCF custody, their parents were involved in the pedo activities, or the kids are not from the area (and have no local family to assume care of them). There's really no other explanation for why none of these kids would be returned home. It's very sketchy that this information is not clarified for the public.

Alpo ago

It says, "The minors who recovered during the operation were being cared for by various Department of Children and Family Services Agencies across the state, according to sheriff’s officials."

This doesn't even make sense so it's hard to know what they meant.

FriesischShipping ago

It's so sketch