It comes off as CBS threatened to fire him because of his twitter feed to me. Then put him on a suspension and are allowing him to come back if he turns off twitter...
Yeah, I read this as either a condition of probation (work probation, not criminal), and/or a teaser for a big story that will take some time to properly research and develop.
get real. It does NOT prove he is onto something big at all. It is just as likely his bosses got legal threats and do not want to fight a libel case.
He is a liability to them, it is not rocket science that he is being put on a shorter leash.
But JC, I mean you would know lol, but his segment didn't make any specific allegations so it seems like a lawsuit would be futile, and most certainly they had lawyers look at the clip before they aired it. I watched the clip there are no direct accusations that aren't backed up by sources like podesta emails, and he even says over and over there is nothing proven.. I'm not sure who could sue him at that point it seems he covered those bases. But then again maybe they just don't wanna mess with a legal proceeding even if they think they can win. Can you nail down an actual accusation he has made? I didn't see one..
Certainly if you can, you would already be talking with your lawyers..
Although that could get real messy if someone sued them for slander or whatever because then evidence could be made to come to light during the proceedings.. of course if there is existence of such..
So sure if our favorite rock star in DC is innocent then the comet hits the court room, but if there is anything to hide I'm pretty sure our rockstar doesn't want to get involved in court rooms..
I want sooooo bad to ask you about David brock and what's going on right now... but I know you wouldn't tell me, and definitely wouldn't tell me in public forum. But I would love to get your take on it. It's weird how the democrats seem to be distancing themselves. I mean I don't think rockstar jimmy likes him that much anymore but what do i know maybe those rumors are unfounded. Who knows what's real these days.
But YOUR opinion would fascinate me, and that's complete aside from all this other talk going on.
view the rest of the comments →
IlluminatiKing ago
What did he mean by this?
Fateswebb ago
It comes off as CBS threatened to fire him because of his twitter feed to me. Then put him on a suspension and are allowing him to come back if he turns off twitter...
jbdigriz ago
Yeah, I read this as either a condition of probation (work probation, not criminal), and/or a teaser for a big story that will take some time to properly research and develop.
6u65868686 ago
This seems most likely. Somebody powerful made the station take his video down, and he just got the "Shut the Hell Up if you like your job" speech.
Just proves he is on to something big. These people sure are dumb.
Birdzeyeview ago
get real. It does NOT prove he is onto something big at all. It is just as likely his bosses got legal threats and do not want to fight a libel case. He is a liability to them, it is not rocket science that he is being put on a shorter leash.
6u65868686 ago
oh no, a random pedo defender has appeared to debunk the discussion. whatever shall we do...
FriesischShipping ago
That's no sympathizer! That's alleged pedophile James Alefondlus. Rule #1 of pedoclub = don't talk about pedoclub, you he done fucked up right?
Fateswebb ago
But JC, I mean you would know lol, but his segment didn't make any specific allegations so it seems like a lawsuit would be futile, and most certainly they had lawyers look at the clip before they aired it. I watched the clip there are no direct accusations that aren't backed up by sources like podesta emails, and he even says over and over there is nothing proven.. I'm not sure who could sue him at that point it seems he covered those bases. But then again maybe they just don't wanna mess with a legal proceeding even if they think they can win. Can you nail down an actual accusation he has made? I didn't see one..
Certainly if you can, you would already be talking with your lawyers..
Although that could get real messy if someone sued them for slander or whatever because then evidence could be made to come to light during the proceedings.. of course if there is existence of such..
So sure if our favorite rock star in DC is innocent then the comet hits the court room, but if there is anything to hide I'm pretty sure our rockstar doesn't want to get involved in court rooms..
I want sooooo bad to ask you about David brock and what's going on right now... but I know you wouldn't tell me, and definitely wouldn't tell me in public forum. But I would love to get your take on it. It's weird how the democrats seem to be distancing themselves. I mean I don't think rockstar jimmy likes him that much anymore but what do i know maybe those rumors are unfounded. Who knows what's real these days.
But YOUR opinion would fascinate me, and that's complete aside from all this other talk going on.