At this point, people who don't believe that there is something incredibly sinister going on with a huge pedophile network operating throughout governments around the world are basically saying that they believe instead that there is a global conspiracy against the elite by hundreds/thousands of ordinary people and kids who have decided to lie about it. We know that one of the two scenarios has to be true, because no one is denying that all these people have come forward claiming the same things about people in different governments/elite circles.
Why do so many find it easier to believe that all those ordinary people and children are and have been lying, despite receiving no profit from it and instead often receiving scorn and ridicule, than to believe that the most wealthy and powerful, a group made up of a much larger than average percentage of sociopathic personalities, might abuse that wealth and power in terrible ways?
The only reason I can come up with is that a large proportion of people, either subconsciously or secretly, think that those wealthy and powerful individuals are actually superior - that their word means more than the word of a homeless Turkish street kid solely because they have wealth and power. Those people who deny pizza gate are basically admitting that actually, they do think some people have more value than others, that wealthy, well known, powerful people, are to be granted special trust over the rest of the human population just because they're wealthy, well known and powerful. And the majority of the world's wealthy and powerful people are white men, so next time someone pours scorn on Pizzagate, remind them how their stance on this issue means that, logically and necessarily, they are automatically and subconsciously assigning rich old white men a special status that places them above everyone else, and that their prejudice is not only vile, but it amounts to being a pedophile-child-murdering apologist.
You're actually wrong about that. It's not 1880. Today, the wealthiest men on Earth are Jews, Arabs, Russians, Chinese and from many other groups, including the Japanese and even Mexicans. Sorry man, but your views are out-of-date and you sound like a SJW. Quite simply, Anglo-Saxons don't have much power anymore - and they are probably one of the least likely ethnic groups to condone child abuse.
Also, just look at all the non-European descent Americans who voted for Clinton and Obama, just for the handouts. Not exactly the most moral people, are they?
Try to mull over what you just said. Jews, Arabs, Chinese and Africans just don't have strong record on children's rights, whichever way you to try to spin it. This is a worldwide, cross-cultural problem.
P.S. I'm from England and still live here. Let me try to explain something to you. American culture is WAY worse, with rampant abuse issues across all ethnic groups and religions. I would NEVER want to live there. Also, I see you're avoiding the Jewish connection and attempting to conflate Anglos with Talmudism, while giving Jews a free pass. Is that because you are one?
My point was to give a rationale that could be said to SJWs for why their disbelief in PG actually goes directly against everything they say they stand for - as you say, SJW types think the world is run by rich old white men, so that's why it's there in the rationale - to convince people of things you need to have some kind of an inroad using one of their already firmly held beliefs and leading them to the logical conclusion that holding that belief (i.e. rich old white men rule the world and it's terrible) necessarily means accepting either a) victims/witnesses claiming abuse by elite pedo rings are credible, have no reason to lie, whereas the elites have every reason to lie and we already know they are terrible warmongering capitalists anyway or b) the elites are telling the truth, these ordinary people are lying for whatever reason, implying that you hold the word of privileged and powerful members of society (in SJW eyes rich white men) in higher esteem and as more credible than those of anyone else.
Do you see the reasoning? It's a persuasive argument to use to get certain people to think differently about their assumptions and question whether disbelieving PG actually fits into the moral framework and world view they've constructed for themselves.
Personally I have no idea what nationalities or races are the wealthiest and I don't really care either because it doesn't actually matter. The wealthiest and most powerful Jews, Arabs, Chinese, Mexicans, Americans, whatever... they are all together in a category that has way more significance than whichever ethnic/religious/national/cultural category they also fit into. And all ordinary Jewish, Arabic, Chinese, Mexican, American etc citizens are all together in a separate category. Those two categories are all that matter. Bill Gates, Carlos Slim, the Bushes, the Clintons, Putin, Soros, Jack Ma, the royals of Saudi Arabia, the European royals etc all have far more in common with one another than they do with us, and you and I have far more in common with your average person living in the US, Mexico, Russia, Europe, China, the Middle East, Africa etc than we do with any of the world's wealthiest and most powerful, no matter what our respective ethnic backgrounds. This is a fact that people need to start realising, because the divisions sown among ordinary citizens only serve to weaken us as a whole and make it easier for the sociopaths at the top to have their wicked way with us.
Edit: Oh and no I'm not Jewish, and conflating Anglos with Talmudism? To be honest I don't even really know what Talmudism is! So that wasn't intentional if you read it that way. I'm also British - about as boringly genetically English as you can get, with a little bit of Celtic in me.
view the rest of the comments →
kaptklok ago
"PEDOPHILIA IN DUTCH GOVERNMENT"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x_ao17qmm98
SpikyAube ago
At this point, people who don't believe that there is something incredibly sinister going on with a huge pedophile network operating throughout governments around the world are basically saying that they believe instead that there is a global conspiracy against the elite by hundreds/thousands of ordinary people and kids who have decided to lie about it. We know that one of the two scenarios has to be true, because no one is denying that all these people have come forward claiming the same things about people in different governments/elite circles.
Why do so many find it easier to believe that all those ordinary people and children are and have been lying, despite receiving no profit from it and instead often receiving scorn and ridicule, than to believe that the most wealthy and powerful, a group made up of a much larger than average percentage of sociopathic personalities, might abuse that wealth and power in terrible ways?
The only reason I can come up with is that a large proportion of people, either subconsciously or secretly, think that those wealthy and powerful individuals are actually superior - that their word means more than the word of a homeless Turkish street kid solely because they have wealth and power. Those people who deny pizza gate are basically admitting that actually, they do think some people have more value than others, that wealthy, well known, powerful people, are to be granted special trust over the rest of the human population just because they're wealthy, well known and powerful. And the majority of the world's wealthy and powerful people are white men, so next time someone pours scorn on Pizzagate, remind them how their stance on this issue means that, logically and necessarily, they are automatically and subconsciously assigning rich old white men a special status that places them above everyone else, and that their prejudice is not only vile, but it amounts to being a pedophile-child-murdering apologist.
Reversible ago
You're actually wrong about that. It's not 1880. Today, the wealthiest men on Earth are Jews, Arabs, Russians, Chinese and from many other groups, including the Japanese and even Mexicans. Sorry man, but your views are out-of-date and you sound like a SJW. Quite simply, Anglo-Saxons don't have much power anymore - and they are probably one of the least likely ethnic groups to condone child abuse.
Also, just look at all the non-European descent Americans who voted for Clinton and Obama, just for the handouts. Not exactly the most moral people, are they?
Try to mull over what you just said. Jews, Arabs, Chinese and Africans just don't have strong record on children's rights, whichever way you to try to spin it. This is a worldwide, cross-cultural problem.
P.S. I'm from England and still live here. Let me try to explain something to you. American culture is WAY worse, with rampant abuse issues across all ethnic groups and religions. I would NEVER want to live there. Also, I see you're avoiding the Jewish connection and attempting to conflate Anglos with Talmudism, while giving Jews a free pass. Is that because you are one?
SpikyAube ago
My point was to give a rationale that could be said to SJWs for why their disbelief in PG actually goes directly against everything they say they stand for - as you say, SJW types think the world is run by rich old white men, so that's why it's there in the rationale - to convince people of things you need to have some kind of an inroad using one of their already firmly held beliefs and leading them to the logical conclusion that holding that belief (i.e. rich old white men rule the world and it's terrible) necessarily means accepting either a) victims/witnesses claiming abuse by elite pedo rings are credible, have no reason to lie, whereas the elites have every reason to lie and we already know they are terrible warmongering capitalists anyway or b) the elites are telling the truth, these ordinary people are lying for whatever reason, implying that you hold the word of privileged and powerful members of society (in SJW eyes rich white men) in higher esteem and as more credible than those of anyone else.
Do you see the reasoning? It's a persuasive argument to use to get certain people to think differently about their assumptions and question whether disbelieving PG actually fits into the moral framework and world view they've constructed for themselves.
Personally I have no idea what nationalities or races are the wealthiest and I don't really care either because it doesn't actually matter. The wealthiest and most powerful Jews, Arabs, Chinese, Mexicans, Americans, whatever... they are all together in a category that has way more significance than whichever ethnic/religious/national/cultural category they also fit into. And all ordinary Jewish, Arabic, Chinese, Mexican, American etc citizens are all together in a separate category. Those two categories are all that matter. Bill Gates, Carlos Slim, the Bushes, the Clintons, Putin, Soros, Jack Ma, the royals of Saudi Arabia, the European royals etc all have far more in common with one another than they do with us, and you and I have far more in common with your average person living in the US, Mexico, Russia, Europe, China, the Middle East, Africa etc than we do with any of the world's wealthiest and most powerful, no matter what our respective ethnic backgrounds. This is a fact that people need to start realising, because the divisions sown among ordinary citizens only serve to weaken us as a whole and make it easier for the sociopaths at the top to have their wicked way with us.
Edit: Oh and no I'm not Jewish, and conflating Anglos with Talmudism? To be honest I don't even really know what Talmudism is! So that wasn't intentional if you read it that way. I'm also British - about as boringly genetically English as you can get, with a little bit of Celtic in me.