You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ScientiaPotentia ago

So you say you have "truth" but then state that it isn't convincing enough for me to take it seriously. That is literally the same as having no proof whatsoever and therefore no "truth". The fact you are so sensitive to being criticized further calls into question your position. Weak. I think I will just hang out here and shit talk you a while longer because it pleases me. If you actually had anything worth saying you would have said it.

the real Semite is the Asiatic Black Man

That is the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard. The Old Testament (OT), the Torah, the Talmud, and Cabala all have disparaging accounts for black skinned people as the "sons of Ham" who's descendants were cursed by God because of Ham's sin against his father Noah. In one account Noah being drunk on wine is raped by Ham which gives light to the other verses. According to all Semitic texts, Shem is the father of the Semites; all Arabs and Jews come from his line which never intersects with Ham's because Ham was banished. The curse follows them and their descendants forever. All throughout Semitic text you can find time and again disparaging remarks about Blacks. If these text are actually "Holy or Divine" then that shows God himself has a deeply held hatred for Black Africans. I didn't write it. It's your "Holy" book.

Further, there has never been a skeletal remains of an African found in the Near East. Never. You would think that if the ancient Semites were Black the would have left some evidence. Even a non-scientist can easily see the differences between African skeletons and Asian/European skeletons.

Tell you what; one more try. Give me what you got and we'll see if you actually have any "truth".