You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ScientiaPotentia ago

That is stupid. Solomon was Indo-European. Even the Queen of Sheba was likely Arab however she could have been Indo-European too. Literally none of the people in the OT were Black African. You are 100% wrong. Even Jesus was described by the Romans as having dirty blond hair and grey blue eyes in non-biblical references and letters. Most people in Judea at that time were Indo-European. They weren't even the Arabs you see there today. The Arab Conquest would not occur for another 700 years. Orient literally means the east; the place of the rising sun. The Grand Orient is a reference to the sun. Were you sleeping though all those rituals. They all have to do with the sun!

PrideOfOshtekk ago

What Roman texts are you referring to? There's no real historical evidence of Christ existing in the first place, so I would like to see sources.

ScientiaPotentia ago

That isn't true. There are a number of letters, but the church doesn't want them to be focused on because they basically prove he was just a man among many different so called "prophets". The Letters of Lentulus are one set, but they are considered apocryphal. The Letters between the Flavians a powerful Roman Dynasty which later ruled Rome and Judean government officials like Pontius Pilate. Plus describe him similarly too, War of the Jews by Josephus (a Roman historian who lived at the time of Christ in Judea) has a description of Christ which is almost the same.

In almost every account they describe him as being a nuisance like every other leader of the many sects in Judea. Further, there is some question as to their authenticity too.