http://archive.is/99kx1 http://archive.is/EcVaE http://archive.is/3WidN http://archive.is/kbZ0V http://archive.is/0Mhoe http://archive.is/ID6Ml http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-399376/A-barbaric-kind-beauty.html http://archive.is/aZYOT http://archive.is/UQfsV http://archive.is/eRTNj http://archive.is/G00wG
Organ trafficking is rather widely discussed here but I believe that the importance of stem cells is being neglected. Tony Podesta worked as a lobbyist for a California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) which deals in them. The Clinton's have always been big proponents of stem cell research as well. Their largest individual donor is the Ukrainian tycoon Victor Pinchuk who runs a series of prenatal hospitals called "Cradles of Hope". Victor's brother, Anatoliy is a scientist and he has performed experiments with nanosilver and rat stem cells.
Hospitals in the Ukraine have been shown to have killed babies and harvested their bodies for stem cells as reported by the BBC. The woman sent to investigate this case was from a subgroup of the Council of Europe and seemed prepared to bungle the case until the cut up corpse of a harvested baby was found. The Council of Europe has notably partnered with George Soros to create a European Roma Institute.
I once thought the connection between Victor Pinchuk and the Clinton Foundation was primarily about trafficking surrogate babies but upon learning all this I believe harvesting organs from stem cells is much more likely. It would be fairly easy to get away with considering many of the premature babies are expected to die anyway. What does everyone else think? Am I starting to go nutty?
view the rest of the comments →
VIrginiaPerson ago
You can only get stem cells from fetuses and from the umbilical cords of infants. I have only heard of stem cell treatments being used in Chinese trials for rare diseases. Supposedly, the person getting the stem cells feels about 10-20 years younger, but in the studies/personal accounts I read, it wasn't known how much was from the physical therapy the people got and how much was from the stem cells themselves.
Something that was being considered, last I checked, was that when a person was injected with the stem cells, their own shitty cells were not removed, so they were rejuvenated, but not cured from whatever was wrong with them. Let's say they had heart disease. The new cells would take over, so they would have a temporary benefit. But eventually whatever gave them heart disease in the first place would give it to them again. A genetic or environmental issue or whatever. So one would have to keep getting the stem cells, which was economically impossible.
For a normal person. If you had unlimited resources you could drink up all the stem cells you wanted and stave off lots of different diseases.
The only drawback was that there was not yet enough data to know if the stem cells would/could turn cancerous. Or that, possibly, you would put a stem cell in one place and it would mistakenly turn into something else. Your heart cells would turn into foot cells or whatever. You wouldn't want a foot growing in your chest.
Sorry if this information is old. I stopped reading about this stuff several years ago.