I wanted to add a couple more theories to what the handkerchief could signify.
As you know two leading theories are that the handkerchief is used to express preference, as in gay "hanky code", or that the handkerchief is used in ritual sexual abuse of children (as in the artwork of ) and nicely pointed out here:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1583977
Two other possibilities are:
(a) Handkerchief is used to drug the victim, eg with chloroform, see these cases for examples:
"he then produced a bottle of chloroform, poured some on a handkerchief which he applied to the young woman's face. "
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.528-az0572.x/full
"While she was unlocking her apartment’s door, the trio came from behind and put a handkerchief on her face, following which the survivor fell unconscious.”
http://www.mid-day.com/articles/neighbours-kidnap-rape-woman-attempt-to-throw-her-out-of-society/15589183
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Danish-woman-rape-Gang-sedated-woman-with-rubber-solution-before-rape/articleshow/28919517.cms
"While I was looking at things a guy pressed a handkerchief on my nose. I fainted and was kidnapped. Then four men gang raped me.”
http://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/pakistan-honor-killing-escape-trial-human-rights-rape
Archives:
http://archive.is/Oue56
http://archive.is/9Ecok
http://archive.is/25vfO
http://archive.is/tLuFR
http://archive.is/hZutS
http://archive.is/Vt86B
(b) Handkerchief could be used to gag the mouth of the victim, as in these examples:
"Norielene struggled to free herself but Bernadas held her hands while Plurad covered her mouth with a handkerchief"
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2002/dec2002/138361_63.htm
"She said the driver instead brought her to Camp 7, gagged her with a handkerchief and raped her at gunpoint."
http://www.philstar.com/nation/2015/03/29/1438519/taxi-driver-hunted-rape
A third possibility is to clean up the "mess" after the rape, and remove traces of the incident. I think this is less likely, but it does happen, see this example of rape of a 9-year old:
"The girl said she bled profusely and the suspect tried to stop the bleeding by cleaning her vagina with his handkerchief and shirt"
http://wacolnigeria.org/wacol/?page_id=283
view the rest of the comments →
AreWeSure ago
You could twist it up really tight and snap it at the freshman in the locker room.
You can soak it in cold water and put it on the back of your neck on hot days.
You can tie it tight around your arm, to make it easier to find a vein when you're jonsing for your fix of heroin.
For when you sneeze.
To protect your shirt against pizza grease.
You can soak it gasoline and use it to start a fire if the cops are coming.
You can tie it around your forehead when you're in your snipers nest, so sweat doesn't get in your eyes when you're on a Hillary Clinton ordered kill mission.
You can think a million reasons to use a handkerchief. It doesn't matter. Imagination is not evidence.
DarkMath ago
"a Hillary Clinton ordered kill mission"..........Epic. Yes AreWeSure there are a lot of things a handkerchief could be used for. Here are some more examples of when a handkerchief is used:
If you lived in Ghouta Syria you could wet it and cover your nose and mouth in an effort to avoid inhaling Qaddafi's Sarin Gas that Killery had shipped to rebels there in an effort to create a False Flag attack and precipitate NATO joining the conflict to bring down Assad.
You could use it on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express to cover your mouth while you cough so you don't get the other DC power brokers sick before your "vacation" on Pedo-Island even begins.
What the f*** AreWeSure. You posted your usual drivel because you manufactured evidence related to the infamous Sandler email: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32795
You assume Susan Sandler had talked on the telephone with the Realtor and found out that handkerchief was "pizza related". Of course there is ZERO EVIDENCE Susan Sandler did that. And that means Susan Sandler added in "pizza related" herself which is reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeealy strange.
But that doesn't matter to you. You'll ignore evidence when it doesn't suit you and you'll make up evidence when you need it. You're a joke. The OP says "could also be for"......as in it's a possible explanation given the evidence we have that suggests Susan Sandler added the "pizza related" herself without any evidence of ever being told that by the Realtor.
Get it AreWeSure?
AreWeSure ago
Also the Sarin used at Ghouta, Syria only matches the recipe used by the Syrian Army. They used a very specific chemical that was not known to be used in any other WMD program. When they gave up the chemical weapons Syria declared thousands of pounds of this chemical as part of the WMDs. And the UN found this chemical in the ghouta soil samples. This Sarin was not Libyan in Nature.
If it was the rebels who used it (and it wasn't), they would have gotten their hands on it within Syria.
DarkMath ago
"only matches the recipe used by the Syrian Army".......Only Syria is allowed to use that recipe? This isn't like the formula for Coca-Cola AreWeSure. It's merely a ratio of prescuror chemicals that could easily be mimicked say IF YOU WANTED TO MAKE PEOPLE THINK IT WAS ASSAD. Which may not even be the case here as the chemical weapons lab at Porton Down says the Sarin couldn't have come from Assad. Basically the whole thing is one giant cluster fuck and you can't eliminate anyone as a suspect on the chemical testing alone.
Young child, grass-hopper, closed head wound sufferer,
There are mountains of evidence pointing to use of Sarin by BOTH sides. Even the New York Times says the Syrian rebels have used chemical weapons 52 TIMES(may have included Sarin, definitely mustard gas and other nasty shit for sure).
Who should we believe regarding Ghouta? You appear to side with the some in the UN, the American CIA, Mike Morrell and other stalwart geniuses who told us Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons. Remember that one AreWeSure? I'm gonna disagree with you and go with the other group at the UN and Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh who accuses the Rebels, not Assad, of the Sarin attack at Ghouta.
"Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal."
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n24/seymour-m-hersh/whose-sarin
http://whoghouta.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-conclusion.html
AreWeSure ago
Porton Down got the Sarin how? Oh yeah, Russia gave it to them.
And it is a unique chemical I'm speaking of. Unknown to any other wmd program. The missiles used to deliver only were seen and used by the Syrian army, who kept inspectors away from the site for days while repeatedly shelling it.
I don't buy Hersh's story whatsoever. Obama's change of mind was due to politics
DarkMath ago
"Unknown to any other end program.".........And the CIA is incapable of getting their dirty little hands on some? Really?
"Obama's change of mind was due to politics"........Pure Gold! Obama catches Assad crossing a "red-line" and using a weapon of mass destruction to kill 1300 innocent men, women and children but he got distracted by "politics"?
Actually I heard it was because at around that time Obama had really gotten into Game Of Thrones and was sort of inaccessible. I mean seriously. This was GAME OF THRONES people. Shit got real for a while there.
;-)