This means that the earliest Madeleine disappeared was 10:45 pm in GMT, which translates to 5:45 EDT. Thus, the disappearance happened well after 24 hours had passed from the completion of the DC meeting.
It says picture taken May 2nd 2007. True, that's not definitive proof. Just thought it might be helpful to researchers to know where he most likely was the day prior to when Madeleine went missing.
Not threatened. It is simply not evidence of anything at all. The main issue is that the post provides no specific evidence that Podesta was even at the May 2 event, so the post should be removed since it does not support the claim.
Even if it showed his attendance on May 2, it is just not relevant to know where someone was on the day PRIOR to the event in question, unless it either eliminates the possibility or makes it more likely (like if he were in Portugal on that date).
view the rest of the comments →
reasonedandinformed ago
This provides no conclusive alibi:
There is no evidence that either Podesta were even in attendance for this particular event on May 2, 2007 in DC.
More importantly, all it does is show where he would have potentially been the morning prior to the event, which happened late in the day on May 3, 2007, over Timeline of Madeleine McCann's disappearance: https://thoseconspiracyguys.com/timeline-of-madeleine-mccann-disappearance/.
Appreciate the efforts here, but it does nothing to address where these men were on May 3, 2007, which is the critical date. They have no alibi that anyone knows, and there are some claims that both brothers are placed in the same resort community where Madeleine disappeared: http://victuruslibertas.com/2016/11/do-john-and-tony-podesta-have-a-connection-with-missing-child-madeleine-mccann/
The May 4 email referenced in the post is actually evidence that Podesta was on travel since it was written by his assistant on his behalf.
Sheilaaliens ago
It says picture taken May 2nd 2007. True, that's not definitive proof. Just thought it might be helpful to researchers to know where he most likely was the day prior to when Madeleine went missing.
Edit: by all accounts this places him in DC the morning of May 2nd. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/news/2007/05/03/3001/conversation-with-colombian-president-uribe/
Don't be threatened just because new evidence comes to light.
reasonedandinformed ago
Not threatened. It is simply not evidence of anything at all. The main issue is that the post provides no specific evidence that Podesta was even at the May 2 event, so the post should be removed since it does not support the claim.
Even if it showed his attendance on May 2, it is just not relevant to know where someone was on the day PRIOR to the event in question, unless it either eliminates the possibility or makes it more likely (like if he were in Portugal on that date).