You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SpikyAube ago

I feel really bad for these people, I hope no one takes what you're saying at face value, because honestly most of them look like completely normal nice people who like reviewing stuff, it seems as though you're looking at them assuming they are pedophiles to start off with and then making everything fit that, when if you just happened across most of these randomly not thinking about pedophiles at all, you wouldn't look twice. The one with the discount for the girl - that is clearly a joke as the picture is of a girl, probably his kid or niece or something, in the store's cart, so he's making a joke. That's what it seems to me, and all his others seem innocent.

There may be some of them that are dodgy - the basement one with the toy on the balcony could be something, but really it's impossible to tell with this little info, and it just is not the case that every man who is a local guide on google maps or reviews things is a pedo reviewing kids!! Come on, this is the kind of stuff that makes people think PG is some crazy story made up by people with paranoid imaginations, it really does no good for the investigation at all!

Stick to the things that are clearly wrong or clearly have evidence that links them to some other person or place that has already been proven/exposed as involved. This started off well and interesting with the farm and the CIA HQ etc, but it seems like you got carried away and started seeing pedophiles everywhere! Don't assume that every who has taken a photo of a kid is a pedophile :-(