You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ConcernedParent2 ago

David Sabin – has submitted 133 photos and has had a staggering 350,000 views of his photo’s. His review of the Farm was that he wasn’t happy it closes at 4pm. (Pissed off Pedo).

Stop saying this shit without any proof! You are going to end up smearing someone innocent. Being pissed that a place closes at 4PM does not make them an "angry pedo" - as a parent, if I'm taking my kids somewhere, it has to be in the afternoon since I work and they go to school. "Family Friendly" places that close at 4PM is something most working parents would be pissed about.

350,000 views for 133 photos is not "STAGGERING", that's actually pretty small, especially if he has been doing this for years. Do you know anything about people who make reviews? Do you realize that there are people who do it for a living? Do you know that schools, restaurants, and hiking trials are really popular places to review, because that's what people search for the most, especially people out of town?

I'm not saying that there is nothing shady going on, but you better damn well make sure the connections and evidence is strong before you start giving out people's information and branding them a goddamn pedo. You could get this sub shut down if you end up smearing someone innocent.

DefenderOfTruth ago

Thank you for typing that, @concernedparent2. You put into words what I was thinking. I'm not convinced there's anything to this. Seems like a big stretch.

I understand the primise of the OP though: pedo communication through google maps. But, this seems like such a backward/vague way for them to communicate when they have other options.

ConcernedParent2 ago

I'm not saying it isn't possible. These sick monsters have already proven they can be sloppy with their methods of communication.

But the people OP is citing as "examples" is really weak. OP has already shown he didn't know that Sausage Party was a real movie, or that American Girl Deluxe Parties are real either. These reviewers appear to be regular reviews and OP is jumping to conclusions. OP also has no idea how web traffic works, because having a few hundred thousand views on 133 photos is not a lot. This very thread already has over 1,000 views in a few hours. Thousands of people are searching and viewing these reviewer's photos, so it's not hard to reach that number, especially if these pictures are years old.