While watching some YouTube video concerning the abducting of Madeleine McCann, I read the comments and one person said they contacted the author of the movie "The True Story of Madeleine McCann - Buried By Mainstream Media" Richard D. Hall T to send him information about "the possible resemblance / connection of John and Tony Podesta regarding the police sketches in the alleged abductors in Madeleine's case." .
Richard D. Hall responds to this person. Amazingly, he tries to debunk each PG evidence point by point, and, IMO, does a rather poor job at it. For example, at one point he says:
The girl in the pictures is James Alefantis god-daughter. It is the same girl in at least three of the photos.
She is clearly smiling in the picture where she is lightly taped to the
ping pong table.
She appears in the “Chicken lover” picture. The actual phrase is Chicken Hawk, which means a man that pursues young boys for sex. Chicken lover >
refers to bestiality not pederasty. Also she is a girl not a boy which makes the phrase meaningless.
I think it is just strange for him to say what he says, telling us we don't have any proof, yet he doesn't give any proof for his claims himself.
The user put the full response on Google Plus. Here is the link https://plus.google.com/110688325483564477562/posts/EL1FpdXV5Zi
view the rest of the comments →
The_Kuru ago
Here's what he says about the e-fits:
The e-fits of alleged Madeleine suspect cannot possibly be the “Podesta brothers”. Each of the two e-fits were constructed by two different people and are two persons recollections of ONE alleged suspect. So the two e-fits are not two people. They are in fact the same person. This means the e-fits are unreliable because they look so different.
That is ridiculous because why would he believe that there is only one abductor when the e-fits look so different? Why wouldn't he suspect that the witnesses were describing two different abductors who were in on it together?
Alpo ago
The origin of the e-fits themselves is mysterious and suspicious. They were the work of Henri Exton, a former British intelligence agent who worked for a private investigation company hired by the McCanns. They were suppressed from public view for 5 years. It has also been said that the Irish couple could not possibly have given a good description of the man they said they saw, based on the fact that they had only glimpsed him many months before. So why do the e-fits bear an uncanny resemblance to the Podesta brothers?
SIMONBARROW ago
The so-called eyewitness is not the real source. The e-fits are taken from photos.
Alpo ago
I think you're right.