While watching some YouTube video concerning the abducting of Madeleine McCann, I read the comments and one person said they contacted the author of the movie "The True Story of Madeleine McCann - Buried By Mainstream Media" Richard D. Hall T to send him information about "the possible resemblance / connection of John and Tony Podesta regarding the police sketches in the alleged abductors in Madeleine's case." .
Richard D. Hall responds to this person. Amazingly, he tries to debunk each PG evidence point by point, and, IMO, does a rather poor job at it. For example, at one point he says:
The girl in the pictures is James Alefantis god-daughter. It is the same girl in at least three of the photos.
She is clearly smiling in the picture where she is lightly taped to the
ping pong table.
She appears in the “Chicken lover” picture. The actual phrase is Chicken Hawk, which means a man that pursues young boys for sex. Chicken lover >
refers to bestiality not pederasty. Also she is a girl not a boy which makes the phrase meaningless.
I think it is just strange for him to say what he says, telling us we don't have any proof, yet he doesn't give any proof for his claims himself.
The user put the full response on Google Plus. Here is the link https://plus.google.com/110688325483564477562/posts/EL1FpdXV5Zi
view the rest of the comments →
Watcher_Down ago
To put it simply Richard D Hall doesn't want his own Madeleine McCann narrative diluted by PG. Ok the guy has spent a lot of time & money not to mention his own resources putting together his version of the McCann case. Which he is quite convinced is one of death & disposal of the body rather than abduction. The evidence of the cadaver dogs does tend to skew it in this direction. RDH is always in demand of 'evidence' to substantiate any statement and the irrevocable evidence of the dogs seems to stand up. However the controversial assumptions he goes on to make concerning various members and ex-members of the British secret service and the media not to mention powerful people with government connections has yet to be proven. A seldom mentioned fact concerning Madeleine is that she was an IVF conceived child, along with both of her parents being doctors. If we accept the fact that this is a case of a death and body disposal, could it also include organ-harvesting as there are also questions as to who supplied the sperm for the conception, and was she 'made to order'? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-487063/I-AM-Madeleines-dad-Gerry-McCann-rejects-claims-sperm-donor-used-IVF.html
https://archive.is/d6O8v
SIMONBARROW ago
Good summary of Hall's views. Of course, the Podestas could have acquired Madeleine's dead body rather than abducted a live Madeleine and the explanations why they might have wanted a dead child's body are numerous.