While watching some YouTube video concerning the abducting of Madeleine McCann, I read the comments and one person said they contacted the author of the movie "The True Story of Madeleine McCann - Buried By Mainstream Media" Richard D. Hall T to send him information about "the possible resemblance / connection of John and Tony Podesta regarding the police sketches in the alleged abductors in Madeleine's case." .
Richard D. Hall responds to this person. Amazingly, he tries to debunk each PG evidence point by point, and, IMO, does a rather poor job at it. For example, at one point he says:
The girl in the pictures is James Alefantis god-daughter. It is the same girl in at least three of the photos.
She is clearly smiling in the picture where she is lightly taped to the
ping pong table.
She appears in the “Chicken lover” picture. The actual phrase is Chicken Hawk, which means a man that pursues young boys for sex. Chicken lover >
refers to bestiality not pederasty. Also she is a girl not a boy which makes the phrase meaningless.
I think it is just strange for him to say what he says, telling us we don't have any proof, yet he doesn't give any proof for his claims himself.
The user put the full response on Google Plus. Here is the link https://plus.google.com/110688325483564477562/posts/EL1FpdXV5Zi
view the rest of the comments →
The_Kuru ago
Here's what he says about the e-fits:
The e-fits of alleged Madeleine suspect cannot possibly be the “Podesta brothers”. Each of the two e-fits were constructed by two different people and are two persons recollections of ONE alleged suspect. So the two e-fits are not two people. They are in fact the same person. This means the e-fits are unreliable because they look so different.
That is ridiculous because why would he believe that there is only one abductor when the e-fits look so different? Why wouldn't he suspect that the witnesses were describing two different abductors who were in on it together?
Drnoway ago
It is really so. This is the biggest mistake i have seen among the pizzagate evidence. You can check it out on old news.
They look different because the human memory and eywitnesses are not very reliable. There are many psychological studies made on the subject. I am not a chill, im just trying to point out this mistake that can be used against pizzagate investigation. The Madeleine case is a dead end, there is no way that there can be new evidence found after these years.
SIMONBARROW ago
The e-fits are not based on eyewitness recollections. They are clearly taken from actual photos of the Podesta brothers, which have been photoshopped, for example, by reversing Tony Podesta's head, so as to make them look a little different. Why this was done, no one seems to have a clue, and I don't either.