While watching some YouTube video concerning the abducting of Madeleine McCann, I read the comments and one person said they contacted the author of the movie "The True Story of Madeleine McCann - Buried By Mainstream Media" Richard D. Hall T to send him information about "the possible resemblance / connection of John and Tony Podesta regarding the police sketches in the alleged abductors in Madeleine's case." .
Richard D. Hall responds to this person. Amazingly, he tries to debunk each PG evidence point by point, and, IMO, does a rather poor job at it. For example, at one point he says:
The girl in the pictures is James Alefantis god-daughter. It is the same girl in at least three of the photos.
She is clearly smiling in the picture where she is lightly taped to the
ping pong table.
She appears in the “Chicken lover” picture. The actual phrase is Chicken Hawk, which means a man that pursues young boys for sex. Chicken lover >
refers to bestiality not pederasty. Also she is a girl not a boy which makes the phrase meaningless.
I think it is just strange for him to say what he says, telling us we don't have any proof, yet he doesn't give any proof for his claims himself.
The user put the full response on Google Plus. Here is the link https://plus.google.com/110688325483564477562/posts/EL1FpdXV5Zi
view the rest of the comments →
gerrycan ago
In so far as the Podesta bros not being there at the time, I believe that Richard is 100% correct. What is more incriminating is that the Efits were made some years after the event by an investigator that was on the run from the DoJ in the US, and seems to have used the situation to fire a warning shot across the bow of those who were after him. IOW - you come after me, and I know who and what you are and I will take you down with me. Hence the likeness to the Podestas. It is actually more incriminating when you think about it. Why the fuck would the POdesta bros who are rich be prowling round streets in Portugal kidnapping children themselves when we know that there is a huge operation there who they can simply purchase one from?? Wake the fuck up please.
newworldahead ago
Ok, if you say so. But what do you think of the rest of his points?
gerrycan ago
Honestly, I think he's full of it. He clearly hasn't looked at the issue at all. He tends to jump the gun at times and over stretches. He did it with 911 in a big way and had to retract a lot. However, in his favour, I believe him to be well meaning and for that reason I would welcome the dialogue, and encourage it. He needs put straight on the pizzagate issue, and I hope he will similarly correct himself on this issue as he has on others, in time.