While watching some YouTube video concerning the abducting of Madeleine McCann, I read the comments and one person said they contacted the author of the movie "The True Story of Madeleine McCann - Buried By Mainstream Media" Richard D. Hall T to send him information about "the possible resemblance / connection of John and Tony Podesta regarding the police sketches in the alleged abductors in Madeleine's case." .
Richard D. Hall responds to this person. Amazingly, he tries to debunk each PG evidence point by point, and, IMO, does a rather poor job at it. For example, at one point he says:
The girl in the pictures is James Alefantis god-daughter. It is the same girl in at least three of the photos.
She is clearly smiling in the picture where she is lightly taped to the
ping pong table.
She appears in the “Chicken lover” picture. The actual phrase is Chicken Hawk, which means a man that pursues young boys for sex. Chicken lover >
refers to bestiality not pederasty. Also she is a girl not a boy which makes the phrase meaningless.
I think it is just strange for him to say what he says, telling us we don't have any proof, yet he doesn't give any proof for his claims himself.
The user put the full response on Google Plus. Here is the link https://plus.google.com/110688325483564477562/posts/EL1FpdXV5Zi
view the rest of the comments →
quantokitty ago
What an idiot! But then some pro-pedophilia nutjob would take on the job of botching an investigation of Madeleine McCann. It makes sense. Especially since he can't even read: http://archive.is/hiU2N It says: #chickenlovers. Look, I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble, but things aren't this simple. You can't think: "Oh, great! This guy is doing a documentary on Madeleine McCann so he must be trying to seek the truth and on our side" anymore than you can trust that the baby pictured is James The Majestic Ape Alefantis' Goddaughter. It doesn't work that way. This guy sounds like a complete disinformationist and a real cnt and douchebag. Fck him and his movie.