@dickface8, since this is a meta post, I'm removing it per rule 4. Please post these meta links on /v/pizzagatewhatever if you would like to discuss them. Thank you.
A post with the sole purpose of bringing attention to a post that is a non-meta post is a meta post. In other words, the original post is not meta, but yours is.
Ok, so assuming you're legit, and your history does look plausible, can you tell me why the initial post picked up no steam? The 16 day old post that the one I linked links to had a shitload of attention before it was deleted. Now it seems you're trying to keep this on the downlow. So my question is assuming you're a true intentioned investigator like myself, do you not see that this is a gigantic possible lead and should be flagged as such?
I cannot answer on behalf of the community as to you why a certain post has not picked up steam.
Your post doesn't even link to the original post from 16 days ago, which was otherwise both relevant and popular with its current 127 upvotes, and is still up.
The intermediary post that you linked to (that links to the 16-day post) has not been deleted, it is also still up.
Fair enough. Mind blowing that a mod here doesn't have an interest in investigating this. Kinda like a "the Donald" subreddit where the mod doesn't give a shit about Trump. Interesting. Anyway...
view the rest of the comments →
wecanhelp ago
@dickface8, since this is a meta post, I'm removing it per rule 4. Please post these meta links on /v/pizzagatewhatever if you would like to discuss them. Thank you.
dickface8 ago
This isn't a meta post at all. It shows direct correlation to the syndrome with the big blue eyes with bags under them? Care to rebut?
wecanhelp ago
A post with the sole purpose of bringing attention to a post that is a non-meta post is a meta post. In other words, the original post is not meta, but yours is.
dickface8 ago
Ok, so assuming you're legit, and your history does look plausible, can you tell me why the initial post picked up no steam? The 16 day old post that the one I linked links to had a shitload of attention before it was deleted. Now it seems you're trying to keep this on the downlow. So my question is assuming you're a true intentioned investigator like myself, do you not see that this is a gigantic possible lead and should be flagged as such?
wecanhelp ago
dickface8 ago
Fair enough. Mind blowing that a mod here doesn't have an interest in investigating this. Kinda like a "the Donald" subreddit where the mod doesn't give a shit about Trump. Interesting. Anyway...