To the vast majority of Americans, the name Marc Dutroux doesn't mean much. Drop that name in Belgium though and you're likely to elicit some very visceral reactions. Dutroux - convicted along with his wife in 1989 for the rape and violent abuse of five young girls, the youngest of whom was just eleven - now stands accused of being a key player in an international child prostitution and pornography ring whose practices included kidnapping, rape, sadistic torture, and murder.
Dutroux was sentenced in 1989 to thirteen years for his crimes, but was freed after having served just three. This was in spite of the fact that, as prison governor Yvan Stuaert would later tell a parliamentary commission: “A medical report described him as a perverse psychopath, an explosive mix. He was an evident danger to society.”
The man who turned Dutroux loose on society, Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet, soon after received a prestigious appointment to serve as a judge at the European Court of Justice at the Hague. Shortly after Dutroux’s release, young girls began to disappear in the vicinity of some of his homes. Though technically unemployed and drawing welfare from the state, he nevertheless owned at least six houses and lived quite lavishly.
His rather lucrative income appears to have been derived from trading in child sex-slaves, child prostitution, and child pornography. Many of his houses appeared to stand vacant, though at least some of them were in fact used as torture and imprisonment centers where kidnapped girls were taken and held in underground dungeons.
Some of Dutroux’s homes were used in this way for several years following his early release, with a growing body of evidence to indicate that fact to the police. True to form though, authorities failed to act on the information, or acted on it in a way that showed either complete incompetence (according to most press reports), or police complicity in the operation (according to any sort of logic).
Police seem to have routinely ignored tips that later proved to be accurate, including a report from Dutroux's own mother that her son was holding girls prisoner in one of his houses. In addition, key facts were withheld from investigators working on the disappearances and lines of communication were unaccountably broken, inexcusably hindering the investigation.
Police did search one of Dutroux's homes on no less than three separate occasions over the course of the investigation. On at least two of those occasions, two of the missing girls were being held in heinous conditions imprisoned in a custom-built dungeon in the basement. Nevertheless, the police searches came up empty, despite the fact that the investigating officers reported “hearing children’s voices on one occasion,” according to the Guardian.
It was not until August 13, 1996, four years after the disappearances began, that authorities arrested Dutroux, along with his wife (an elementary school teacher), a lodger, a policeman, and a man the Guardian described as “an associate with political connections” – elsewhere identified as Michel Lelievre.
Two days later, police again searched Dutroux's home and discovered the soundproof dungeon/torture center. As CNN reported, three years earlier “police ignored tips from an informant who said Dutroux was building secret cellars to hold girls before selling them abroad.” And in 1995, the same informant had told police that Dutroux had offered an unidentified third man “the equivalent of $3,000 to $5,000 to kidnap girls.”
Incredibly, it was later reported by the Guardian that police actually had in their possession a videotape of the dungeon being constructed: “Belgian police could have saved the lives of two children allegedly murdered by the paedophile Marc Dutroux if they had watched a video seized from his home which showed him building their hidden cell.” The tape had been seized in one of the earlier searches.
At the time of the final search, two fourteen-year-old girls were found imprisoned in the dungeon, chained and starving. They described to police being used as child prostitutes and in the production of child pornography videos. More than 300 such videos were taken into custody by the police.
On August 17, the story got grimmer as police dug up the bodies of two eight-year-old girls at another of Dutroux's homes. It would later be learned that the girls had been kept in one of Dutroux’s dungeons for nine months after their abductions, during which time they were repeatedly tortured and sexually assaulted, all captured on videotape. The girls were then left to slowly starve to death. Alongside of their decimated corpses was the body of Bernard Weinstein, a former accomplice of Dutroux who had occupied one of the houses for several years. Weinstein had been buried alive.
A few weeks later, two more girls were found buried under concrete at yet another of the Dutroux properties. By that time, ten people were reportedly in custody in connection to the case. Elsewhere in Belgium, the News Telegraph reported that: “The corpses of two women and parts of a third body have been discovered in a freezer at a Lebanese restaurant in Brussels.”
As the body count mounted, the outrage of the Belgian people grew. They demanded to know why this man, dubbed the 'Belgian Beast,' had been released after having served such an absurdly short sentence. And to know why, as evidence had continued to mount and girls had continued to disappear, the police had chosen to do nothing. How many girls, they demanded to know, had been killed as a result of this inaction?
Adding further fuel to the fire, as a Los Angeles Times report revealed, was that: “a highly regarded children’s activist, Marie-France Botte, claims that the Justice Ministry is sitting on a politically sensitive list of customers of pedophile videotapes.”
http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html
view the rest of the comments →
wonderpig ago
Actually that tragedy was caused by laws against pedophilia. If consensual pedophilia were legal (with parents consent) then unstable adults would not snap and resort to crime. They would have no reason to kidnap or kill kids to hide the evidence.
That's why Dutroux could not reveal where the kids were. That's why the kids died.
This is how sick societies create their own problems.
postfascion ago
"Resort to crime" riiight. Pizzagate is sure bringing out some sick rationalisations by some damaged individuals.
wonderpig ago
How are they sick? How are the individuals damaged? Let's see if you can answer these questions without going around in circles.
postfascion ago
They're sick because the cycle of abuse is based around the inflicting of one humans sexual will over another human with no choice in the matter. To think that those kind of actions are not abhorant is to be suffering from the same pathology (even if it is by proxy). Do you want rape legalised also? Cus that's what you're arguing for, only the damage is arguably worse because a child's mind is still forming. "Round in circles"? Lol, you're stupid as well as an abuse apologist. I say lol, but it really isn't that funny.
wonderpig ago
Sickness is a provable tangible condition of dysfunction but you are attempting a circular definition: saying anyone who believes something you don't is sick. But love is not sick, rather it is healthy. Denying love as authorities and misguided parents do to kids is sick. Consensual sexual contact between generations is good. You are say anyone who thinks differently from you is suffering from the disease you describe. That is also a circular argument you use to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you. Nice trick but not true. Can you prove this "damage to a child's mind" happens? Do it. You try to equate consensual love with rape when it is the opposite. You have never studied the most basic logic. These are just tricks not facts or logic. If it is abuse then how does it abuse. Abuse has to be real harm. Show me the proof.
postfascion ago
Proof? Ok, how about the endocrine system releasing hormones at puberty that encourage sexual interest? Why not before? Adults have already gone through the process so are therefore more interested in sex, whereas beyond fooling around with others their own age occasionally (which I think is healthy generally) kids are more interested in learning about other things. Think about any classic childhood endeavour, climbing trees, games etc. and you have a clue as to what level of development they are at, in the case of physical activity they are learning about the mechanics of their bodies, in the case of games they are learning about social interaction, then comes puberty, and the complexity increases. Imposing a sexual dynamic (and make no mistake, it is an imposition) prior to when nature deems it relevant is damaging because it is forcing a child to run before they can walk. It is based around gratification for the adult no matter how you try to rationalise it with your apparent intellect. Love nurtures, it does not impose. If it wasn't such a serious misconception, your statement about LOVE would be fucking laughable, and I didn't even get round to the physical incompatibilities between adult and child. Now, I'm cutting this off, I have better things to do with my time than debate the obvious, and frankly I feel Fucking dirty talking to the likes of you. Hope you don't have kids, they don't need to raised around pathology. There's enough in the world as it is. Nature knows best, she knows you, and your sickness will be consumed in the fires of evolution. Bitch.
wonderpig ago
"frankly I feel Fucking dirty talking to the likes of you." Then stop posting.