You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Marthvedderette ago

It's called limited hang out. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout. They want Comet ping pong to be our only focus, I noticed this because the douchey CIA mods, here on voat!! Delete any of my posts that are related to human trafficking and the Clintons. Realize that pizzagate on voat had been co-opted by controlled opposition.

pizzagate4real ago

I've been a lurker here for a little while and I agree that some of the mods here are controlled opposition after what I've seen. Check the mod who flaired this thread (wecanhelp) he created his account December 6 and just a few days later was made a MOD. Looking at his history, he never even contributed anything helpful and his comment history gives a picture of how many posts he deleted. Then I made a comment here in reply to wecanhelp and mod crensch replied immediately after I commented, almost as if he had the notification of my comment. Some really cucked things going on here with the mods.

TimeForPitchForks ago

I was thinking since there is so much doubt with the honesty and integrity of the Mods here, they should All permanently step down whether they have done something wrong or not and be replaced by Mods that were voted to be Mods by the members of this main PizzaGate subverse. It would end all this 'the mods are fucking with us' bullshit which stymies the investigation. And the focus can be once again to gather and vet the info being posted here.

SpikyAube ago

I was asked if I'd be a mod, and I said ok but I don't have much time and have not been a mod before, so was made a mod and I am definitely not an evil one, so I would say that means the person who contacted me is not one either. I kind of assumed they asked everyone, because I'm not a prolific submitter of stuff or anything.

I have noticed a lot of people getting upset at things being deleted when the actual reason they were deleted was to protect the legitimacy of PG in the eyes of newcomers doing their first venture here to see if there really is anything to it - posts without good sources or evidence, or posts that were irrelevant and taking up space on the front page that cold be taken up by really damning, well-sourced posts. I think there are a lot of people investigating who have not done research or presented evidence before in a way that is as water tight as possible in terms of potential criticism, and that can lead to misunderstandings about why something was taken down. The objective is to preserve the credibility of the investigation, so that it is too difficult for the MSM and casual first time visitors to dismiss it as crazy people reading too much into stuff. Trying to be both a place for ideas and out of the box suggestions to look into, as well as a sort of PR presentation of PG and the more solid evidence, is incredibly difficult. And some of the posts that contain really weak evidence and tenuous links are suspected of being submitted by 'the other side' in order to discredit PG. So everyone's suspicious of everyone else!

It would be great if we could think of a way to really verify everyone's status, like if there was something simple people could be asked to do that someone on the other side would never do, even to preserve their cover. I can't think of anything though that wouldn't involve doxxing everyone. And voting sounds good, but then we'd be worried that pedo subscribers had infiltrated in great enough numbers to ensure their people got voted in. I don't know, it's a really difficult problem but I'm sure there must be some clever solution we could come up with somehow.

TimeForPitchForks ago

Ok, Mods Voted in by Ranking Members, who have outstanding contributions and reputations here on voat.