The email screen shots the were posted from the AMA with a James victim have not only been scrubbed from reddit but also archive, voat and all others. Please message me if you have a back up of the emails. They seem to be the only direct proof its real. It should also be noted these are a potential gold mine due to fact there the only images I have seen scrubbed this intensely ever!
view the rest of the comments →
SChalice ago
"there was no reason to suspect he was doing anything illicit with children."
He signs his name 'bear' and the emails suggest that there may have been consensual sex.
This isn't a smoking gun, in fact, kind of the opposite. It only shows me that James is a delusional asshole but we already knew that.
JamesMissingEmail ago
Q: "there was no reason to suspect he was doing anything illicit with children."
A: Hes been caught posting sexually suggestive pictures with children publicly so that his friends can comment additional sexually suggestive comments.
Q:He signs his name 'bear' and the emails suggest that there may have been consensual sex. A: So your addmitting this IS JAMES A. then? What does the signature name of BEAR have to do with anything?
Q:This isn't a smoking gun, in fact, kind of the opposite. It only shows me that James is a delusional asshole but we already knew that. A: EXCEPT for the part where there is an alleged victim PUBLICLY CLAIMING JAMES SEXUALLY ASSAULTED AND DRUGGED HIM!
SChalice ago
Sexually assaulting an adult is not pedophilia (Although an 18 year old is hardly an adult IMO).
You should understand that I suggest that this is a false-flag because of the statement, "there was no reason to suspect he was doing anything illicit with children." He is putting himself on to the chopping block and saying that JA is innocent.
"What does the signature name of BEAR have to do with anything?"
He had already decided to involve himself sexually with JA. Similar to a woman who knowingly marries a beast that rapes her.
This is mentally and legally different than raping a child.