What does this mean for all the 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, etc. conspiracies? Were they just so off base that they weren't worth censoring? Unbelievable by the masses? Too hard to point fingers at individuals? Just struck me as odd, the all out attack on PG compared to other seemingly larger, more damning conspiracies that have mountains of tangible evidence i.e. 9/11, when this one that is still struggling to find that crucial puzzle piece. Must be close....good work everyone.
Agreed... you still can't even really talk about it. Which is a strange public phenomenon. It is taboo to even question the narrative of 9/11 to this day. 15+ years later. And more unanswered questions continue to bubble up. The recent commentary from the former NIST employee casts even more doubt on the official "Commission Report"... and yet, the silence is deafening.
Yep, I'm a trained aircraft fuel systems mechanic and some friends and family still won't believe me when I tell them that Jet-A type civilian fuel, like all military grades, is totally incapable of melting construction steel in the towers. They simply don't want to have to face the fact our own government did it. It's easier to remain ignorant.
Right first they will say there was no melted steel and if you prove there was basically a foundry under the site for months afterwards then they stick to that jet fuel did this, and you cannot convince them it's just not possible, they start twisting the laws of physics to explain shit.. or if you ask about WTC7 they don't even know about it and have no explanation for its free fall collapse but still will not admit it was done on purpose. Even if you show that it's free fall speed and ask what happened to all the resistance that held the building up for all those years? Even if you drop a ball off the side of the building and time it people still won't agree and it is physically impossible for a building to collapse at freefall speed... without explosives. People would rather believe that magic happened defying the laws of physics than see if for what it really was. That's some strong cognitive dissonance right there buddy.
view the rest of the comments →
peatsagayt ago
What does this mean for all the 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, etc. conspiracies? Were they just so off base that they weren't worth censoring? Unbelievable by the masses? Too hard to point fingers at individuals? Just struck me as odd, the all out attack on PG compared to other seemingly larger, more damning conspiracies that have mountains of tangible evidence i.e. 9/11, when this one that is still struggling to find that crucial puzzle piece. Must be close....good work everyone.
User890020 ago
9/11 was definitely censored. BIG TIME.
There are now countless crucial puzzle pieces... It's just a matter of political will at this point.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Agreed... you still can't even really talk about it. Which is a strange public phenomenon. It is taboo to even question the narrative of 9/11 to this day. 15+ years later. And more unanswered questions continue to bubble up. The recent commentary from the former NIST employee casts even more doubt on the official "Commission Report"... and yet, the silence is deafening.
Fateswebb ago
What is even weirder is I think like half of the people admit they don't believe the official story of 9/11 but it's still off limits to talk about.
JastheMace ago
Yep, I'm a trained aircraft fuel systems mechanic and some friends and family still won't believe me when I tell them that Jet-A type civilian fuel, like all military grades, is totally incapable of melting construction steel in the towers. They simply don't want to have to face the fact our own government did it. It's easier to remain ignorant.
Fateswebb ago
I mean really if jet fuel melts steel how in the hell could we make engines that don't melt? Because 2800 is very hot!! Lol
Fateswebb ago
Right first they will say there was no melted steel and if you prove there was basically a foundry under the site for months afterwards then they stick to that jet fuel did this, and you cannot convince them it's just not possible, they start twisting the laws of physics to explain shit.. or if you ask about WTC7 they don't even know about it and have no explanation for its free fall collapse but still will not admit it was done on purpose. Even if you show that it's free fall speed and ask what happened to all the resistance that held the building up for all those years? Even if you drop a ball off the side of the building and time it people still won't agree and it is physically impossible for a building to collapse at freefall speed... without explosives. People would rather believe that magic happened defying the laws of physics than see if for what it really was. That's some strong cognitive dissonance right there buddy.