What does this mean for all the 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, etc. conspiracies? Were they just so off base that they weren't worth censoring? Unbelievable by the masses? Too hard to point fingers at individuals? Just struck me as odd, the all out attack on PG compared to other seemingly larger, more damning conspiracies that have mountains of tangible evidence i.e. 9/11, when this one that is still struggling to find that crucial puzzle piece. Must be close....good work everyone.
It's a longer subject and takes into account "What constitutes proof?" It's a big study.. And yes, the other things are known and can be proved.
The State crimes perps mostly get away with what they do via mind control techniques and sophistry [denying the standards of proof have been met when they have been] and playing the cards of dozens of fallacies to people who have not been taught nor encouraged to sort things.. For instance "No Smoking Gun" that is constantly re-peated. They used that for the JFK event along with "crazy conspiracy theorists" which was invented for the same purpoae.
They use the same frikking shit over and over again because that is all they have. Once you see it you can un-see it, either.
view the rest of the comments →
peatsagayt ago
What does this mean for all the 9/11, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, etc. conspiracies? Were they just so off base that they weren't worth censoring? Unbelievable by the masses? Too hard to point fingers at individuals? Just struck me as odd, the all out attack on PG compared to other seemingly larger, more damning conspiracies that have mountains of tangible evidence i.e. 9/11, when this one that is still struggling to find that crucial puzzle piece. Must be close....good work everyone.
LawofTruth ago
Other conspiracies weren't backed by hard evidence. IMO the emails are hard to dissipute.
samhara ago
That's false.
It's a longer subject and takes into account "What constitutes proof?" It's a big study.. And yes, the other things are known and can be proved.
The State crimes perps mostly get away with what they do via mind control techniques and sophistry [denying the standards of proof have been met when they have been] and playing the cards of dozens of fallacies to people who have not been taught nor encouraged to sort things.. For instance "No Smoking Gun" that is constantly re-peated. They used that for the JFK event along with "crazy conspiracy theorists" which was invented for the same purpoae.
They use the same frikking shit over and over again because that is all they have. Once you see it you can un-see it, either.