You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

quantokitty ago

This is so hilarious and hypocritical for so many reasons. Let's see a series of douchebag women come out of the HRC woodwork and claim they were groped by Trump when there was no proof whatsoever ... and then a reporter claims to be was assaulted by Trump's campaign manager ... the claim is backed up by ANOTHER reporter ... but a video comes out showing both LIED and there's no retraction, no follow up in arresting either for false claims, AND the FAKE STORY was circulating for WEEKS unchallenged because the media printed it without ANY PROOF!!!! That's how it works! Rumor, lies, and innuendo are fine when it goes with the narrative of trying to ruin an opponent's life, but when a victim is really speaking out? Well, you take down the Wikipedia page, censor, and ban them.

whitehand ago

That is a valid point which may show that this ama was legitimate.

quantokitty ago

You're right. Probably was. Or is it that it could have been? Maybe the problem is it could be true?

starseedlover ago

fuck all that shit. that is all I have to say