I think he did a great job, he said there is no hard proof which there isn't, but also said there has been no real investigation, which then bears to ask why there would be hard proof if there hasn't been an investigation. But he makes a pretty good case with the symbols and tying the main actors together. I think he did about as good as he could possibly do sticking to the facts..
view the rest of the comments →
Fateswebb ago
I think he did a great job, he said there is no hard proof which there isn't, but also said there has been no real investigation, which then bears to ask why there would be hard proof if there hasn't been an investigation. But he makes a pretty good case with the symbols and tying the main actors together. I think he did about as good as he could possibly do sticking to the facts..