The DOJ dropped the ball and should have indicted him long ago. The witnesses are long gone in his case, I'm sure. Menendez, who was no doubt guilty, had the last word on this issue. We don't need to rope Menendez back into PG. That's my opinion, and yes, I am following along very closely.
I emphatically disagree. To anyone who might suggest Podesta was an anomaly, one can point to Menendez as evidence of a pattern. For goodness' sake, high-ranking individuals in her 2008 and 2016 campaigns both have pedophilia allegations against them, and you posit that the former is irrelevant? You have Clinton, a campaign, and child-sex allegations. I'd say it's connected.
You are the one who is limiting the investigation to the Clinton's circle. I prefer the 'CIA owns everyone in DC' angle. Menendez is chump change and a distraction. He will be scooped up if this investigation goes where it should.
I'm not limiting the investigation to her circle, but rather simply connecting dots that heretofore I have not seen connected. In trying to spread knowledge about this subject to unwilling listeners, I am often confronted with the argument that "People at that level would never do that" and so on. I imagine others hear that argument, too. The Podesta emails are suspicious, of course, but then paired with the knowledge about Menendez (who as a sitting US Senator is hardly "chump change"), it connects Pizzagate to a longer timeline, and as such casts a wider net than Pizzagate alone. So, it doesn't "narrow" the circle; it broadens it.
view the rest of the comments →
remedy4reality ago
The DOJ dropped the ball and should have indicted him long ago. The witnesses are long gone in his case, I'm sure. Menendez, who was no doubt guilty, had the last word on this issue. We don't need to rope Menendez back into PG. That's my opinion, and yes, I am following along very closely.
Jem777 ago
Awesome. Thanks for reply. These guys are so compromised and guilty.
vc29 ago
I emphatically disagree. To anyone who might suggest Podesta was an anomaly, one can point to Menendez as evidence of a pattern. For goodness' sake, high-ranking individuals in her 2008 and 2016 campaigns both have pedophilia allegations against them, and you posit that the former is irrelevant? You have Clinton, a campaign, and child-sex allegations. I'd say it's connected.
remedy4reality ago
You are the one who is limiting the investigation to the Clinton's circle. I prefer the 'CIA owns everyone in DC' angle. Menendez is chump change and a distraction. He will be scooped up if this investigation goes where it should.
vc29 ago
I'm not limiting the investigation to her circle, but rather simply connecting dots that heretofore I have not seen connected. In trying to spread knowledge about this subject to unwilling listeners, I am often confronted with the argument that "People at that level would never do that" and so on. I imagine others hear that argument, too. The Podesta emails are suspicious, of course, but then paired with the knowledge about Menendez (who as a sitting US Senator is hardly "chump change"), it connects Pizzagate to a longer timeline, and as such casts a wider net than Pizzagate alone. So, it doesn't "narrow" the circle; it broadens it.
tehthu ago
Calling a senator "chump change" seems a bit flimsy to me.
AmishMechWarrior ago
Dropped on purpose most likely