Hello all.
My last thread asking this was deleted by a mod for some strange reason, so I'm reposting asking the same thing. Firstly, I would just like to say I have been following pizza gate since it's very early beginnings. I find all of the evidence pretty damning, and the mainstream media's approach to covering it is an absolute joke to say the least. However, one thing has definitely bothered right from the jump. The pedophile document with all of the symbols, allegedly coming from the FBI, is sourced from the same place as the leaked podesta emails, wikileaks.
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/FBI_pedophile_symbols
I find this to be troublesome for the sake of legitimate research. I feel everything should be sourced from as many places as possible, but when two very crucial pieces of information come from the same source, then their legitimacy is immediately thrown into question in my opinion. Now, I'll be the first to admit ignorance, but I was curious if the pedophile document has a second source and any similar symbols have been found from other sources. Additionally, I was curious if anyone has tried to obtain a copy of the document directly from the FBI, possibly through a FOIA request?
Tanngrisnir ago
The Daily Mail covered it because they are more interested in how celebrities asses look on the beach than propaganda.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3560069/The-symbols-pedophiles-use-signal-sordid-sexual-preferences-social-media.html
Fateswebb ago
Wikileaks has confirmed the document as well as on their site tell you how you can confirm it for yourself. The thing is the documents credibility is not in question and it's contents have been proven to be accurate. So what's the problem?
Cigarette5mokingman ago
Thank you, this is exactly what I was looking for. The more I look into this the creepier it gets.
thezodiac ago
The doc is legit and accurate. Don't need to worry about that.
Cigarette5mokingman ago
It's that type of mentality that's make the "truth" movement so prone to bullshit. Don't EVER just trust that something is legit without coming from multiple sources.
Fateswebb ago
The contents of the document have proven to be accurate, even if the document was fabricated it's contents have been proven accurate. I am saying it wasn't fabricated, but the fact is even if it was, it has been shown to be accurate information a thousand times over by simple research. Also Wikileaks provided a phone number that they themselves called to ask if the document was real and even suggest you yourself call and ask....
newworldahead ago
This ^. It proves that Wikileaks didn't fabricate anything.
DriftingDevoid ago
I had the same exact question. I might have downloaded it from http://vault.fbi.gov but I couldn't find the link anymore.
my question: https://voat.co/v/AskPizzagate/1562244
Mrs_Ogynist01 ago
I posted this to your deleted thread, not sure if you saw it. I found this website http://archive.is/OEqNs They were not to happy that wikileaks outed them. If you check archives, they were using the symbols prior to wikileaks
Freebooter ago
Fascinating stuff, 'these symbols are an umbrella for a range of people' sounds way more legit than the 'these symbols mean child rapists!'
Nuance is best.
DriftingDevoid ago
Not to defend this group of people or anything, but they also noted a difference between the FBI document and the FBI document that was released by WikiLeaks.
Pizzatemp420 ago
Incorrect! The fbi doc is the exact same. They are referring to the summary below the document using different phrasing than the fbi doc. The doc is unaltered.
Edit: you can see this 'discrepancy' in the link OP provided.
Cigarette5mokingman ago
Can you please link to this information?
DriftingDevoid ago
It's in the link Mrs Ogynist01 posted:
http://archive.is/OEqNs