In the comments section of the first link someone asked for proof of these claims. I see no proof has been provided. This is just nonsensical unless the next claim is going to be that David Koresh was CIA and using PSYOPS in his interviews to make himself appear to be running a cult when in fact he had an underground railroad going (which would mean CIA was running the railroad...but wait, because I thought CIA was RUNNING these pedophile rings???). Hard to keep conspiracy theories straight when you come up with so many of them. Perhaps people should stop.
Shills bombard Anonymous5's way too much. Anonymous5 leads people to research on what he said first, then the commentators ask questions on it then he expands more info based on their research or helps guide them a bit further. He also trolls shills all the time in these threads.
This is just nonsensical unless the next claim is going to be that David Koresh was CIA and using PSYOPS in his interviews to make himself appear to be running a cult when in fact he had an underground railroad going (which would mean CIA was running the railroad...but wait, because I thought CIA was RUNNING these pedophile rings???)
All you said here is just dumb haha. It was a cover up at Waco. CIA probably had no involvement working with David. Read the whole thread. Read the rest of his threads.
First comment is by Anonymous5 linking to previous threads.
First person questioning the thread for a source is comment #12, #2 calls it disinfo (possible shill Anon5 multi-quotes to shills)
Anonymous5 answered "New to my threads?"
How anonymous5 does these threads is a more lenient FBIanon, he wants the people to research more on these subjects more than just spouting out information for you to accept as true. I said read the whole thread he replies to other people with information and asks them to dig deeper on what they already have, he agrees to a comment they made, or dismisses what they found. Anonymous5 also continues talks on these subjects in other threads because people still ask questions about it. Anonymous5 doesn't answer a question all the time straight up much like FBIanon, but hey sometimes he does. Information kind of supporting the threads details are throughout the comments. And similar to FBIanons AMAs sometimes we have to find the truths to a thread by ourselves. Its all intersting stuff in Anonymous5's threads I encourage people to read them. He kind of helps pizzagate investigators a few times in each thread, but he covers a various amount of subjects in other threads.
Anon5 is not completely trustworthy. He sprinkles truth and interesting ideas but he never ever confirms anything nor even points where to look. I only find him interesting because he brings up other angles to look at events with but he clearly has his own agenda.
view the rest of the comments →
LaDonnaRae ago
In the comments section of the first link someone asked for proof of these claims. I see no proof has been provided. This is just nonsensical unless the next claim is going to be that David Koresh was CIA and using PSYOPS in his interviews to make himself appear to be running a cult when in fact he had an underground railroad going (which would mean CIA was running the railroad...but wait, because I thought CIA was RUNNING these pedophile rings???). Hard to keep conspiracy theories straight when you come up with so many of them. Perhaps people should stop.
4thDaGrymReaper ago
Shills bombard Anonymous5's way too much. Anonymous5 leads people to research on what he said first, then the commentators ask questions on it then he expands more info based on their research or helps guide them a bit further. He also trolls shills all the time in these threads.
All you said here is just dumb haha. It was a cover up at Waco. CIA probably had no involvement working with David. Read the whole thread. Read the rest of his threads.
LaDonnaRae ago
You conveniently left out the first part of what I said, which is a typical SHILL tactic, speaking of shills.
4thDaGrymReaper ago
haha Im not a shill.
First link is the Anonymous5 Waco thread.
First comment is by Anonymous5 linking to previous threads.
First person questioning the thread for a source is comment #12, #2 calls it disinfo (possible shill Anon5 multi-quotes to shills)
Anonymous5 answered "New to my threads?"
How anonymous5 does these threads is a more lenient FBIanon, he wants the people to research more on these subjects more than just spouting out information for you to accept as true. I said read the whole thread he replies to other people with information and asks them to dig deeper on what they already have, he agrees to a comment they made, or dismisses what they found. Anonymous5 also continues talks on these subjects in other threads because people still ask questions about it. Anonymous5 doesn't answer a question all the time straight up much like FBIanon, but hey sometimes he does. Information kind of supporting the threads details are throughout the comments. And similar to FBIanons AMAs sometimes we have to find the truths to a thread by ourselves. Its all intersting stuff in Anonymous5's threads I encourage people to read them. He kind of helps pizzagate investigators a few times in each thread, but he covers a various amount of subjects in other threads.
archons ago
Anon5 is not completely trustworthy. He sprinkles truth and interesting ideas but he never ever confirms anything nor even points where to look. I only find him interesting because he brings up other angles to look at events with but he clearly has his own agenda.