I actually think it has relevancy to pizzagate. The relevancy beware of whatever this guy says about pizzagate. He didn't just comment on pizzagate, he provided source material used by people in this investigation. He now stands accussed with solid evidence of faking source material. If he comments on pizzagate in the future, it should be looked at with skepticism until corroborated by others.
So I see no reason for deletion.
If it needs to elsewhere, the politics sub seems like the obvious place as this guy is accussed of trying to influence the politics of this country.
view the rest of the comments →
gopluckyourself ago
arewesure rule 1 I'm not even sure where to repost this. maybe try /v/ and /r/conspiracy seems like a good start.
AreWeSure ago
I actually think it has relevancy to pizzagate. The relevancy beware of whatever this guy says about pizzagate. He didn't just comment on pizzagate, he provided source material used by people in this investigation. He now stands accussed with solid evidence of faking source material. If he comments on pizzagate in the future, it should be looked at with skepticism until corroborated by others.
So I see no reason for deletion.
If it needs to elsewhere, the politics sub seems like the obvious place as this guy is accussed of trying to influence the politics of this country.
gopluckyourself ago
k so say that in your post otherwise this is completely unrelated.
AreWeSure ago
How do I do that on a deleted post?