You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wecanhelp ago

Thank you for the cooperative resubmission. Appreciated.

truthseekertx ago

Absolutely. I just want to do my part in helping with the research into this.

wecanhelp ago

Keep that up. We really need quality submissions and leads.

stillinit ago

The fuck? This is what you call quality? This is retardation.

wecanhelp ago

It was a general remark, I haven't read OP's post, I merely skimmed it for rule violations. Sorry for implying otherwise. I felt like encouraging OP as, for all I know, the post followed submission guidelines properly, which is a rarity. I don't have time to personally read and fact-check every submission, I do trust the community to point out issues in the logic or the quality of the sources. I only check for the presence of those sources, as well as a couple of other things, and in terms of that, this submission is fine.

Tl;dr: quality from a submission requirements point of view, not necessarily in terms of content.

Don-Keyhote ago

Only measure to take is agreeing upon significance of symbols as was done with eg alefantis name. For example triangles OK intersecting triangles worse embedded triangles suspect. This conforms to thr ones ive seen. Otherwise all flagging is arbitrary.